Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff

[Clownfish]

do furries really have any foothold in the 'is it moral to have loveual relations with x' category?

saying every furry actually wants to forget animals is like saying every weaboo has love with their body pillow

[Ad Bot]

[Frankie²]

saying every furry actually wants to forget animals is like saying every weaboo has love with their body pillow

one of those things is forgeted up and the other is a furry
im just joking dont get butthurt

[kahnuu]

saying every furry actually wants to forget animals is like saying every weaboo has love with their body pillow

thats not a good comparison because its true

[Clownfish]

im just joking dont get butthurt

naw it's all good my man

[Waru]

considering the context of what nightfox says, you're putting yourself in a bad light for being contrary

you're right.

I see you live up to "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with your bullstuff," seeing as you're completely missing the point.

i'm definitely not missing the point. while night fox is right, i'm just making an offhand joke, chill.

furries, i'm sorry i offended you.

but yeah, 6 year old having love? na.

15 year old sending some lovey pics to a non-minor under the age of 20? meh. 👍

[kahnuu]

you're right.

i'm definitely not missing the point. while night fox is right, i'm just making an offhand joke, chill.

furries, i'm sorry i offended you.

but yeah, 6 year old having love? na.

15 year old sending some lovey pics to a non-minor under the age of 20? meh. 👍

its immoral and illegal what the forget more do you want, shes prob a 1st year in highschool while this guy is 2nd year in college

stop, she isnt prepared mentally at all for any of this loving nonsense and people defending nick are slime

[fireking]

15 year old sending some lovey pics to a non-minor under the age of 20? meh. 👍

uh what the forget

[Freek]

nickpb is a crusty 20 year old and 15 year olds cant consent anywhere in the united states

that's not the point
what night fox was talking about was a 6 year-old and some adult loving them, and I was arguing that the age difference between nick and the girl aren't anywhere near as severe as an adult and a 6 year old loving
and yes, 15 year olds can't consent, but do you really think that this whole situation is something extremely perplexing and mind-boggling to run a 50 page drama? especially with the amount of creeps in their 30's and 40's catfishing 12 year old girls (besides the point), and even just 20 year olds sending nudes to 15 year olds every hour, this whole thing really isn't anything to start a huge debate about. it happens so much nowadays that it really isn't considered extreme predatory, let alone immoral.

[Foxscotch]

no but that's completely different, that's why I brought up the 14 and 19 year olds earlier. the age difference between a 15 year old and a 20 year old isn't drastic at all compared to a 6 year old child and some crusty 34 year old child enthusiast

you're right, it's not as bad, but it's still frickin nasty
whether she says he did or not, nick took advantage of her

[Tenshi]

-snip-

Right and wrong matters little here; it is against the law and there are consequences for such actions.

[Nymph]

Meanwhile I'm just sitting here and trying to avoid being on either side, awaiting Badspots inevitable arrival. This is just one big mess.

[kahnuu]

that's not the point
what night fox was talking about was a 6 year-old and some adult loving them, and I was arguing that the age difference between nick and the girl aren't anywhere near as severe as an adult and a 6 year old loving
and yes, 15 year olds can't consent, but do you really think that this whole situation is something extremely perplexing and mind-boggling to run a 50 page drama? especially with the amount of creeps in their 30's and 40's catfishing 12 year old girls (besides the point), and even just 20 year olds sending nudes to 15 year olds every hour, this whole thing really isn't anything to start a huge debate about. it happens so much nowadays that it really isn't considered extreme predatory, let alone immoral.

CLEARLY alot of people see it as immoral, why do you think this is a loving 50 page drama?
It's immoral and illegal, end of story. As stated above, shes a 1st year in high school and hes a 2nd or 3rd year in college. She is not mentally prepared for this kind of relationship as seen by how shes reacting in blockland saying how she wants to kill herself.

[Foxscotch]

Right and wrong matters little here; it is against the law and there are consequences for such actions.

unless somebody's gonna report nick to the cops, morality is literally the only thing that does matter

[Clownfish]

Meanwhile I'm just sitting here and trying to avoid being on either side, awaiting Badspots inevitable arrival. This is just one big mess.

What would badspot do?
other than lock the thread I guess
nick hasn't violated rules, this thread is just well, drama
it's a bunch of people arguing over how nick is a sick forget

[Waru]

stop, she isnt prepared mentally at all for any of this loving nonsense and people defending nick are slime

don't get ahead of yourself there.

if it's all fine and consented, no forcing on either party, then that's fine, who the forget cares?


nick obviously made bubba uncomfortable and that's not okay. i'm not approving his behavior. it's still out of line with what I think about it.

Are we arguing legality or moralness here? because legality wise, yea that's stuffs forgeted fam. willing nudes? illegal fam.

morally, willing nudes are some creepy grey area. basically forcing to give nudes? ya that's forgeted fam.