Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff

[Rusty³]

Also responding to this, as I don't want to be a hypocrite about ignoring the meat of someone's post. My point here is that you don't go on crusades recommending people stop playing video games because sitting for too long is bad for you, so why go on crusades against people who use drugs responsibly and infrequently?

We discussed at length that so long as a drug user isn't causing harm to anybody and is using in a responsible and appropriate manner then he or she should be able to do what he or she wants.

[Ad Bot]

[$trinick]

because most of you guys post daily in the thread
and it's usually not responsible
hell, even hillkill is using weed to 'live life some more' or so as he put it until he's 18 because he was tricked into believing that once you start working, you never stop
if that's not irresponsible, i don't know what is

I post in the thread to inform people about how to be responsible with their drug use and answering their questions and concerns. Here are some posts from the last couple of days:

The rate at which the acid hits you depends kind of on a lot. Obviously, if you do twice as much you're going to come up faster which means you're going to feel it sooner. It also depends on how long you hold it in your mouth (LSD absorbs more readily through saliva than the stomach), how wet/dry your mouth is, how hydrated you are, etc.

An hour to hit is very normal.

Quick summary for you and anyone else out there who might end up with a tab of acid in their mouth that tastes bad:

LSD itself has no taste. Obviously, usually it comes on a blotter. I think the blotters taste like paper, and paper kind of inherently tastes a little bitter. By this I mean, if it has a very very very light, hardly noticeable taste, you're probably good. However, real LSD is relatively rare.

LSD is extremely hard to produce. Nearly word-wide prohibition of the chemicals you use to make it help make it really, really difficult to actually make. Also, you can only make it if you can get your hands on a properly equipped lab.  No kitchen meth lab is capable of producing LSD. So since it's relatively rare, and highly in demand, people try to pass other stuff off as it.

There's good news: it's ridiculously easy to tell if you've got bad acid. LSD is an extremely potent, tasteless chemical. The chemicals people use to fake LSD are less potent and taste horrible. So, there's one minor tip-off that a tab isn't acid, and then one definite tip off that it's not acid. If you don't know how big acid tabs usually are, they're squares about 1/4 of an inch wide and tall. They're also relatively thin: thicker than paper, but thinner than a paper towel. You can't fit a whole lot of a drug on something that small, so while it works great for LSD, it's harder to fit a decent dose of a research chemical on it. So, if the tab seems bigger than 1/4 an inch squared, it's likely that you've either gotten really really potent LSD (they would have told you) or you've gotten a research chemical. I personally wouldn't throw a tab away for being that size, but I might pass on it in the first place as I wouldn't like to do that much acid at once anyway. However, that doesn't mean that 0.25in tabs are safe. To know for sure, you've gotta taste them.

The research chemical class that is most commonly passed off as 'LSD' is called an NBOMe (pronounced "N-Bohm"). NBOMes are interesting, but not really something you should be consuming. If you happen to put a tab in your mouth, and it tastes extremely bitter, you might be disappointed. That's alright, but you probably shouldn't let that disappointment lead to a 'forget it' attitude. NBOMes are newly discovered, barely researched, and definitely not fit for consumption in the same way other drugs are. While, yes, they will get you high, and you will have a psychedelic experience, it's probably not worth it.

[Daswiruch]

because most of you guys post daily in the thread
and it's usually not responsible
hell, even hillkill is using weed to 'live life some more' or so as he put it until he's 18 because he was tricked into believing that once you start working, you never stop
if that's not irresponsible, i don't know what is

noedit: i gotta back my stuff up

i'm kind of obsessing over this song "young, wild, and free" and it kind of makes me feel i need to hold out on getting a job and live a bit more.

you think that when you get a job your entire life just stops and you're working 24/7/365?
by 'living a bit more' i'm assuming you're meaning to sit around in your house and smoke weed while getting stuff else done/going to other people's houses and doing the same? that just sounds irresponsible, mate.
i'm not trying to force your into doing anything but i'm just trying to inform you on not making stupid choices.
if my assumption is correct, you really need to get your priorities in order like you're almost an adult dude.
you should be working towards your future career(s) at this age.
if my assumption was incorrect, ignore this message entirely and move on.

i've been thinking for a while to get a job, but my cousin told me i need to hold off because "once you start working, you're going to be working your entire life". i'm not saying that i just want to smoke weed and be irresponsible, but i want to live what's left of my childhood a bit more before i become adult and have adult responsibilities. i think about my future every single day, and it scares the stuff out of me because i don't know what to do. i know what it feels like i want to do, but i can't get any sort of experience at this age. weed is my go-to sort of thing because i have so many thoughts clouding my head about my future, my life, and the meaning of existence.

[Rusty³]

noedit: i gotta back my stuff up

I don't understand what point you are trying to make, hillkill =/= Trinick.

[#Jeetlor]

We discussed at length that so long as a drug user isn't causing harm to anybody and is using in a responsible and appropriate manner then he or she should be able to do what he or she wants.

Buy that's not the argument.

[Daswiruch]

I don't understand what point you are trying to make, hillkill =/= Trinick.

Also responding to this, as I don't want to be a hypocrite about ignoring the meat of someone's post. My point here is that you don't go on crusades recommending people stop playing video games because sitting for too long is bad for you, so why go on crusades against people who use drugs responsibly and infrequently?

i was talking about the rec drug thread frequenters

[Rusty³]

i was talking about the rec drug thread frequenters

Okay and if you look at Trinick's and actually read and comprehend them he isn't talking on behalf of every drug user to post in that thread.

[Ravencroft·]

because most of you guys post daily in the thread
and it's usually not responsible
hell, even hillkill is using weed to 'live life some more' or so as he put it until he's 18 because he was tricked into believing that once you start working, you never stop
if that's not irresponsible, i don't know what is

It is strictly stated in the thread's original post that we don't approve of doing drugs before 18. Trinick is an adult and isn't responsible for every person who posts in that thread.

[Rusty³]

noedit Trinick's posts*

[Daswiruch]

Okay and if you look at Trinick's and actually read and comprehend them he isn't talking on behalf of every drug user to post in that thread.

idk how this makes my argument any less valid but i read it as the users in general, not just him

[hillkill]

yo i don't want to be involved in whatever is going on here

[Clownfish]

my beef is with trinick not drug users

[Rusty³]

idk how this makes my argument any less valid but i read it as the users in general, not just him

So if you're saying that the its about the users in general then handpick one extreme case?

[$trinick]

yeah clearly bitching at you for acting like an entitled forgetstick is going on a crusade against people who use drugs

You're not bitching at me for an entitled forgetstick anymore. You're condemning me for my drug use.

What have I even presented as entitled to in this thread? It doesn't even apply to me as an adjective. You have a huge number of words with poor connotative meanings to apply to me correctly, but entitled doesn't apply. Narcissistic, pompous, condescending, haughty, arrogant, vain, conceited, supercilious, sneering, stuck up. Take your pick. I'll admit to it, I'm definitely an arrogant person. But I've developed that arrogancy by talking to people like you. I don't care if you hate me because I'm 'rich,' or 'entitled,' or a 'forgetstick,' but you at least have to have quarter decent reasons for making that assertion. The fact that I make decent money because I have a valuable skill is not a valid reason to look down on me.

[#Jeetlor]

yo i don't want to be involved in whatever is going on here

Your not, she's just using you as an example because its perfectly relevant.