Author Topic: Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff  (Read 270398 times)

Bubbagum was attention whoring in this topic even throwing the victim card all over.

At least Tills wasn't playing the victim card.

Tills knew what she did was wrong because she faked her age and said she was 19 and almost got Nick into serious trouble. Tills didn't want any attention from this and asked for her chat logs to not be redistributed.

From my understand tills lied about its age.
She lied about her age to everyone but Nick, who, by her own account, she told her real age, and he proceeded to send her nude images of himself.
Also tills asked NOT to have the conversation put up on the forums. The original poster did it anyways. It's in there in the phone logs "please don't tell anyone" guess who loving tells other people?

Tills was clearly badgered into this whole thing.
Who gives a stuff what Tills wants?
It's more important to know that there's an adult member of the community who is trying to start loveual relationships with minors, than to care for the feelings of one girl.

I mean, can you whiteknight anymore than that?

It's more important to know that there's an adult member of the community who is trying to start loveual relationships with minors

There is an entire federal law agency that specializes in love offenders, child enthusiasts and loveual assault cases. Leave it to the professional.s

A group of kids on a lego forum have no business in legal affairs such as these.

She lied about her age to everyone but Nick, who, by her own account, she told her real age, and he proceeded to send her nude images of himself.Who gives a stuff what Tills wants?
It's more important to know that there's an adult member of the community who is trying to start loveual relationships with minors, than to care for the feelings of one girl.

I mean, can you whiteknight anymore than that?

The question is what REAL harm could have come to Tills? Oh so what she saw some pictures, if she didn't like it she could easily have blocked Nick, they weren't going to meet up or anything like that either. Also to correct you, according to Tills she did lie to Nick about her age for a significant period of time before telling him, granted from her account of what happened she told Nick sooner than she told everybody else but she still lied to him about her age for a long long time nonetheless.

Also stop loving throwing the word paedophile around.

"child enthusiasm or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive loveual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger." -Wikipedia.

We live in a society now where we have to ask for an ID before we have loveual relations with others. It's completely unromantic and a turn off.

To make matters worse underage girls now carry around fake IDs they use so they can have love with adult men. We now not only have to ask for an ID but we also have to take a picture of their ID just in case they say they were raped.


With all these factors it's the court of law who decides who is innocent or guilty. You can't just claim Tills was 100% innocent on this entire thing.

The question is what REAL harm could have come to Tills? Oh so what she saw some pictures, if she didn't like it she could easily have blocked Nick, they weren't going to meet up or anything like that either. Also to correct you, according to Tills she did lie to Nick about her age for a significant period of time before telling him, granted from her account of what happened she told Nick sooner than she told everybody else but she still lied to him about her age for a long long time nonetheless.
By her own account, she told Nick she was 19 for a long time, as she told everyone else, yes.
But then she told Nick she was 15, and then Nick sent her the images.

And it's not even about what harm would have come to Tills (even though it's known that Nick travels to meet forumers frequently, and also has difficulty keeping things to himself, had she ever reciprocated in sending pictures).
It's the fact that there's a guy here with such dangerously loose morals regarding his interactions with minors. This is a game where the average age of players is about 14.

Also stop loving throwing the word paedophile around.

"child enthusiasm or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive loveual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger." -Wikipedia.
Wikipedias definition of paedophilia is not the same definition used by the various laws around the world.

But if it makes you feel better, I'll just refer to Nick as a loveual predator of minors.

It's the fact that there's a guy here with such dangerously loose morals regarding his interactions with minors. This is a game where the average age of players is about 14.

I have a feeling you're not even as concerned as you claim to be.

It's not your business what he does with Tills. If Tills is cool with it and if her parents are fine with it then who is to say? I don't date underage girls and I don't advocate such stuff but it's not your business.

But if it makes you feel better, I'll just refer to Nick as a loveual predator of minors.

If tills lied about her age for the sole reason to hook up with Nick wouldn't that make tills the loveual predator?

How can he be a loveual predator for underage girls if he originally thought she were 19?

It's only a 4 age difference between tills and nick anyways. Some love age laws are pretty sketchy and some are dumb as forget. For all we know it could have been legal because some states have a rule where it's legal if it's their age plus 4 years. If you fit within the 4 year in between stuff it could possibly be legal if she is 16 and he is 20.


It's not like he is Jared. Jared is a 38 year old having love with 12 year old girls, major difference. Much larger than 4 years.

At least Tills wasn't playing the victim card.

Tills knew what she did was wrong because she faked her age and said she was 19 and almost got Nick into serious trouble. Tills didn't want any attention from this and asked for her chat logs to not be redistributed.
I feel like tills going around blockland, server to server telling people she was going to kill herself in response to this topic

is playing the victim card

just for everyones refference, tills lives in texas, so that's where the law would apply(that should end the law debate). I feel like we're beating a dead horse unless new info is added to the topic

If Nick lives in a state that the age of consent is 18 and if Tills live in a state that has the age consent of 16 then the law applies to whomever is having love in that state.

So Nick could travel to a 16 age of consent state to have love and it's perfectly legal and there is not a damn thing you can do about it.


Hell, Nick could travel to a third world country where it's perfectly legal. Still not a damn thing you can do about it.

If Nick lives in a state that the age of consent is 18 and if Tills live in a state that has the age consent of 16 then the law applies to whomever is having love in that state.

So Nick could travel to a 16 age of consent state to have love and it's perfectly legal and there is not a damn thing you can do about it.


Hell, Nick could travel to a third world country where it's perfectly legal. Still not a damn thing you can do about it.
unforunately
tills is 15

so


yeah