Author Topic: Nizza Deutchsen Man - Spewing hatred  (Read 11961 times)

this is a drama about you dude

and?

im definitely not the only person who ever typed that ever

sometimes it's better to not defend yourself when there's no point in doing it dude.

maybe a, "sorry, i've overreacted, i'll stop doing this" is better than what you're doing right now, ya know?

sometimes it's better to not defend yourself when there's no point in doing it dude.

maybe a, "sorry, i've overreacted, i'll stop doing this" is better than what you're doing right now, ya know?

I already typed two apologies in this thread.

I mean Kahnu definitely doesn't deserve what Caribou deserves

it's not like Kahnu has spent literal years of his life dedicating to trolling as many people as possible

Ike, if you fail to see how Nizza was flaming me, then you need to get to a good optometrist fast.

if you fail to see how Nizza was flaming me

I didn't "fail to see it" I'm saying you fully had it coming, especially after that stunt with trolling some autistic kid because she was an easy target

Boki is right, you should be ban on sight

I didn't "fail to see it" I'm saying you fully had it coming, especially after that stunt with trolling some autistic kid because she was an easy target

Boki is right, you should be ban on sight

I don't even know the guy, he had no right to speak to me like that. It came at random and it was uncalled for and it was completely inappropriate and offensive.

I don't even know the guy, he had no right to speak to me like that. It came at random and it was uncalled for and it was completely inappropriate and offensive.

you used to constantly stuff on my e-friends and such, and 99% sure you still do

That's not really flaming, or at least not by my definition.  Nizza has a point.  Most of us, if not everyone, wants bear tracks to forget off and we think he's a handicap.  

"7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother. "

That's not really flaming, or at least not by my definition.  Nizza has a point.  Most of us, if not everyone, wants bear tracks to forget off and we think he's a handicap.  

"7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother. "

7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother.

you literally JUST proved my point

he just messaged him to tell him hes handicapped as seen here:


7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother.

you literally JUST proved my point
How so?  There's a difference between uncalled for hate, and deserved hate.  Bear tracks deserves the stuff thrown at him.  It's been made evidently clear that the community does not like him, including badspot. 

Flaming would be more so like what you did, telling people they're worthless garbage and they should kill themselves.  THAT is flaming.  Telling someone they're a handicap who should be BoS when they act like a handicap who needs to be BoS isn't flaming.  And again, Nizza is not wrong to say to Bear tracks that he's a handicap that nobody likes.  This is fact. 

Let's do a little experiment, who here likes bear tracks as a member of the community?


7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother.

you literally JUST proved my point
noedit: also I'm not sure if you haven't noticed but people call eachother handicaps here all the loving time lol.

There's a difference between uncalled for hate, and deserved hate.  Bear tracks deserves the stuff thrown at him. 

7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother.

Bear tracks getting stuff thrown at him = post telling someone what an idiot they are

the contradictions watt-son pls

7. Do not flame - If the entire point of your post is to tell someone what an idiot they are, don't bother.

Bear tracks getting stuff thrown at him = post telling someone what an idiot they are

the contradictions watt-son pls
It's not a contradiction, you're just holding dearly to a definition as an argument and you don't seem to understand how that rule actually works.  For being banned for it, I'd imagine you understand the rule, but apparently not.  If you're so sure that he's flaming, then why don't you report him?

Sorry for doubleposting, but let's now use Rally as an example (hope he doesn't mind lol):
Mentioning Yawa to Sugar isn't 'polite' at the fundamental level, we all know she's obsessed with the guy which is amplified by her social disability. You mention this stuff in her presence because you know it would get a rise out of her, why the forget would you mention Yawa otherwise? Go forget yourself richardhead, everyone can see through your pathetic 2-bit bullstuff. I don't give a stuff about Sugar but your painfully miserable attempts at covering your ass-tracks make me want to puke. You're not all-clear because you made fun of a handicap in a 'non-aggressive' or 'nice' manner.

If it's actually this loving hard for you to avoid making fun of disabled people you should probably just avoid talking to people.
"Oh my god, he told the guy to forget himself and he called him a richardhead and a handicap!  H-he... he must be flaming!!!!" - kahnuu's logic 101