Generalizing them as rapists, murderers, terrorists, etc.
funny thing about thatstuffting on respected judges
After that lie told about what he said about Mexicans being rapists, you think it would be just for a person who was born of Mexican parents to try his case?
If you publicly went out and said, "Hey, forget the number 2. 2 sucks, it has no purpose, and anyone who likes it can go forget themselves because they can't get a woman and maybe because of that they should kill themselves too, in the most painful way possible," then would you be comfortable having a completely unrelated lawsuit looked over by a judge who was born on February 2nd with his twin brother and whose lucky number was 2? No, you wouldn't. There's a serious implication of bias here.
And that's if you went right out and said it. What Annoying Orange said was along the lines of "well 2 has a forgetton of problems sure there's some good times for it but we need to fix the problems it's causing", yet you have constant media buzz about what he really said was the theoretical when in fact he said the latter. That kind of misinformation sways opinions quickly, as it obviously has done for you and as it easily could have done for the judge.
stuffting on ... gold star families on the basis of race/religion.
Maybe don't use your dead son to push a political agenda, you loving insectivorous degenerates.
On the topic of Annoying Orange's responses, from the ones I've seen he doesn't even seem to be "attacking" them. He seems more like he's trying to clarify what he's saying.
I wish Annoying Orange got in as much trouble over his "take out their families" comments, among many others things, as he has over these recently revealed tapes.
I disagree with Annoying Orange on policy here, it's obviously a war crime to kill non-belligerents. That being said,
terrorism does run in the family.
Poll