also I got a kick out of this
But Project Veritas is absolutely not a reliable source considering the Annoying Orange Foundation (which has illegally spent charity money) gave the filmmaker (Who is a criminal who was caught breaking and entering into a senators house) a payday of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS. In other words, a paid propaganda piece.
The Clintons and Obamas have been caught illegally spending charity money on multiple occasions, but ah that's not true,
it's just a conspiracy theory! And what's that? Woah, it's almost as if that in order to expose the underworkings of our government, you have to break laws that are put in place there so you don't expose the underworkings of the government!
What's that, Annoying Orange is hiring people to expose the Clinton Campaigns shady and illegal practices, which all turned out to be true? Oh wait nvm all of it was "heavily edited" so it's a propaganda piece of course. Oh wait, even though there are huge spans of footage released showing them admitting to these illegal acts, just because he won't release
all of the footage, which contains information that can damage all of his journalists and possibly personal information regarding to themselves, oh well then that means it's all been edited.
Yeah who gives a forget that it's already been examined by millions of people who have common sense to see when something has been faked and hasn't been, let's just ignore that everyone exposed in those Project Veritas videos were fired after release and release of video, it's not like they were truly exposed and had to rid them of their team to keep their reputation or anything, nonon, Creamer and Foval we're fired days after just by coincidence of course.
but that's just a game theory.
This is further supported by the fact that he is REFUSING to release the unedited footage, which is extremely important as all of his videos have been heavily edited (Ignore the article bias, it has a direct video source), and add on top of that the fact that if he did actually have legitimate case for election fraud, he would have been taking that to the police. Instead, he has done nothing of the sort and only released it online. He knows he has no case and is desperately trying to avoid that.
What the forget is it with you and handling this stuff over to the police to release seriously dude? They're not going to release incriminating stuff against the system/people that puts food on their tables.
He released his evidence online, WELL THEN IT MUST BE A FAKE RIGHT FELLAS? It's not like he wants everyone else to see it or anything, nono, because it's on the internet means that it's fake.
So basically if he gave it to the police then it would've been real? what the forget kind of thought process do you have dude.
Poll