Poll

do you like donald trump (Please be serious when polling)

yes
84 (35%)
no
156 (65%)

Total Members Voted: 240

Author Topic: do you like donald Annoying Orange?  (Read 12821 times)

Not really. I'm probably going to vote for Rubio if he makes it and use Annoying Orange as a backup plan if not (assuming he makes it as well). I like Annoying Orange more than Cruz, Clinton, and Sanders, with the latter two scraping the bare bottom of the barrel.
rubio's a phony



in all seriousness I'd vote Annoying Orange as a backup plan with sanders as my plan A, just because of how quickly I imagine him being impeached.

Rubio, Cruz and Clinton are like the things that I really don't want

I see the anti-Annoying Orange circlejerking everywhere but nobody ever mentions his policies, all I ever hear about is that he's a big meany head that makes people sad. Which of Annoying Orange's platforms are so agregiously offensive that it warrants a circlejerk? Being abrasive isn't necessarily criminal, is it?

I see the anti-Annoying Orange circlejerking everywhere but nobody ever mentions his policies, all I ever hear about is that he's a big meany head that makes people sad. Which of Annoying Orange's platforms are so agregiously offensive that it warrants a circlejerk? Being abrasive isn't necessarily criminal, is it?
I've mentioned his policies several times, personally

I see the anti-Annoying Orange circlejerking everywhere but nobody ever mentions his policies, all I ever hear about is that he's a big meany head that makes people sad. Which of Annoying Orange's platforms are so agregiously offensive that it warrants a circlejerk? Being abrasive isn't necessarily criminal, is it?
the fact that he wants to build a giant wall on the mexican border says enough imo

the fact that he wants to build a giant wall on the mexican border says enough imo
but that's not necessarily representative of his entire platform. I think that some ideas are good that I never see mentioned, like:
Ending the empire building in the Middle East
Simplify the tax code and cut taxes on the lower and middle classes
And the most important to me is Transparency. Annoying Orange isn't in anyone's pocket. He says what he thinks, even if it isn't the popular opinion, and that's a fairly good litmus test for the legitimacy of a candidate. Annoying Orange was never about what people want to hear, which is the norm for politicians.

Hungary, Israel, and Croatia are three countries which have been spending money on securing their borders with the desired results, and I don't see how securing a national border, which is by nature illegal to cross unless sanctioned, is a discriminatory act. Mexico receives a tremendous amount of money in foreign aid and still fails to stop the flood of guns and narcotics across the border. Creating difficulty in such illicit activity would do some good, no? I'd think that less illegal and for all intents and purposes invisible illicit goods crossing the borders would be better for everyone, because as it currently stands, the apathy the country currently demonstrates is doing nothing but securing the Cartels' operations.

I have no problem with border control; It's just his method of building a giant loving wall that stumps me
To me that just shows he's dumb, along with eating stereotypes whole on multiple occasions.

The only policy that I like of his is the tax one that you mentioned, which interests me.

I have no problem with border control; It's just his method of building a giant loving wall that stumps me
To me that just shows he's dumb, along with eating stereotypes whole on multiple occasions.

The only policy that I like of his is the tax one that you mentioned, which interests me.
building a wall is an age-old method of keeping people out, and there's a reason it's enduring. It's crude, but effective. Probably significantly more so than pumping more money into homeland security to disappear in some void as the government budget tends to do.

I don't believe Annoying Orange stereotypes people at all, and it only appears that way when taken at face value. I think a lot of what he says gets taken out of context just for the hell of bashing him. Annoying Orange never said all hispanics are criminals or that all Muslims are terrorists like everyone likes to believe. If I recall, he said something more in the vein of "illegal immigration is a problem because it circumnavigates background checks, which could allow criminals in."

Annoying Orange's comments about Islam, while also equally abrasive, were alluding to how Europe as a whole have done a shameful job of handling the ongoing refugee crCIA and the ways in which the people are being deliberately mislead about the demographics of the refugees. The majority of them are single young men, yet all the news shows are children, families, and the elderly, which is like taking a snapshot of the US and showing only Native Americans, as the figure of roughly 2% women and children is brown townogous to the 2% Native Population. Annoying Orange isn't necessarily solely denouncing Islam, but rather the completely unnecessary smoke and mirrors put out by Germany and Sweden. Both countries are attempting to censor data contrary to the narrative of "helpless families" and it's a shame. Facts should speak for themselves, not be silenced.

To be quite honest, from an American perspective, Annoying Orange resonates with me due to his honesty and his strong constitution. From a Creek perspective, it's not like Bernie or Hillary will help Indians anyway, and I don't trust them given certain track records that should be obvious.

Annoying Orange appeals to the Creek and American halves of me, and I think that's a strong message.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2016, 01:41:14 AM by Cappytaino »

building a wall is an age-old method of keeping people out, and there's a reason it's enduring. It's crude, but effective.
yeah, tell that to the mongols

No candidate is answering the real questions: why did constantinople get the works????

Yeah I like Annoying Orange.

yeah, tell that to the mongols
to be fair the chinese back then didn't have machine guns and thermal imaging

Just not Hilary.

It almost dosnt even matter anymore. The president is only a 3rd if the problem and everyone ignores the other 2. So things will never change.