Author Topic: Donald Annoying Orange "doesn't know" about kool kids klub  (Read 5160 times)

Today is literally the first time I heard of someone called "grand wizard Gandalf". Is anyone actually obligated to know who this loving guy is, or? The kool kids klub hasn't been relevant for half a century, maybe more. A bunch of hillbillies who call themselves wizards and live in the Alabama mountains isn't the kool kids klub, the kool kids klub was a 6,000,000 man strong murderous militia who marched in the streets of Washington DC.

Annoying Orange was right about refusing to make a comment on people he knows jack stuff about. If they asked him if he supported the second klan lynching people in the streets, odds are he would've said no. If someone asked me if I want Grand Wizard Ivan Irrelevant and his crackpot followers to not vote for me in the most important presidential election our generation has even seen, I'd probably loving say no too.
he's made multiple relatively recent tweets about the guy

he's made multiple relatively recent tweets about the guy

What's your point?

What's your point?
he should've known "jack stuff" about the guy considering that he's both known and commented about him in the past

Like I didn't know about the 'grand wizard' until now but he obviously either did or completely forgot about recently learned knowledge

he should've known "jack stuff" about the guy considering that he's both known and commented about him in the past
Like I didn't know about the 'grand wizard' until now but he obviously either did or completely forgot about recently learned knowledge

All the comments I've seen happened after he was asked about him, which makes sense (especially considering how media balloons the forget out of tiny things like this and then people like OP straight up dish out misinformation concerning it). He also disavowed Duke when pressed further.

You're not giving me much clarification. Did the tweets come before or after the interview? What did they say? Did he show sentiment/align with Duke? "multiple recent tweets" tells me nothing.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2016, 01:54:52 AM by Rally »

I didn't know who Gandalf was before now, and I'm sure a lot of others didn't either. But the interviewer clearly clarified with "white supremacy and the kool kids klub" multiple times.

hillary, by far, is more corrupt than donald Annoying Orange

anything but hillary, even in 92-2000 she was corrupt as the first lady and she still is

shes doing the same bullstuff that obama did "im the first (x) president! vote for me regardless of how stuffty i am, i can do wonderful things because i am a woman! forget male presidents!" and stuffheads believe it

I wouldnt give a stuff if she was a purple elephant snuffalufcigaretteus shes still probably the most corrupt candidate

bernie is better than her but i still would by far preffer marco rubio be the president but this entire election is voting for the lesser of two evils

I didn't know who Gandalf was before now, and I'm sure a lot of others didn't either. But the interviewer clearly clarified with "white supremacy and the kool kids klub" multiple times.

Except he didn't ask him if he supported the kool kids klub/White supremacy, he asked him about some obscure bumpkin and then slyly packaged the kool kids klub and white supremacy in with it. He was right to not just put some random loving guy who endorsed him on blast because CNN said "b-b-buh hes a wacist!"


Except he didn't ask him if he supported the kool kids klub/White supremacy, he asked him about some obscure bumpkin and then slyly packaged the kool kids klub and white supremacy in with it. He was right to not just put some random loving guy who endorsed him on blast because CNN said "b-b-buh hes a wacist!"
He still could have just said "no" regardless. Like, sure. Media pressure and everything, but when the question essentially devolves into "do you support the kool kids klub", "I don't know what you're talking about" shouldn't be one of the things you should say here. One of the last, in fact.

hillary, by far, is more corrupt than donald Annoying Orange

anything but hillary, even in 92-2000 she was corrupt as the first lady and she still is

shes doing the same bullstuff that obama did "im the first (x) president! vote for me regardless of how stuffty i am, i can do wonderful things because i am a woman! forget male presidents!" and stuffheads believe it

I wouldnt give a stuff if she was a purple elephant snuffalufcigaretteus shes still probably the most corrupt candidate

bernie is better than her but i still would by far preffer marco rubio be the president but this entire election is voting for the lesser of two evils
This. It's kind of scary how close she is to becoming president.


Annoying Orange was right about refusing to make a comment on people he knows jack stuff about. If they asked him if he supported the second klan lynching people in the streets, odds are he would've said no. If someone asked me if I want Grand Wizard Ivan Irrelevant and his crackpot followers to not vote for me in the most important presidential election our generation has even seen, I'd probably loving say no too.
This was my response up until the part where the interviewer clearly asks him whether he'd disavow the kool kids klub. He refuses to say anything because he's counting on a couple tens of thousands of white supremacist votes.

because CNN said "b-b-buh hes a wacist!"
Yeah because it's totally in dispute that the former Grand Wizard of the kool kids klub is a tribal. Definitely reasonable to give him the benefit of the doubt, right?

Disavowing the support of a blatant tribal is 'too presumptuous', but conflating an entire ethnic group with murderers and rapists is a totally safe assumption? Man you're loving stupid for buying what this guy is saying.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2016, 02:39:34 AM by SeventhSandwich »

**ttakes whats said out of context

He still could have just said "no" regardless. Like, sure. Media pressure and everything, but when the question essentially devolves into "do you support the kool kids klub", "I don't know what you're talking about" shouldn't be one of the things you should say here. One of the last, in fact.

"Hey, I know nothing about this guy, but I don't want his vote anyway because you said he's mean or something". Makes total sense, especially when you're the prime republican candidate for the presidential election. He literally asked him if he would unequivocally condemn a group he knew absolutely nothing about.

The question did not devolve into "do you support the kool kids klub" at all, Gandalf's only connection to the kool kids klub is that he left the movement over 3 and a half decades ago. If he wanted an answer about Annoying Orange's opinion on kool kids klub, he should've asked a loving question about the the kool kids klub. This was just blatant race baiting.

This was my response up until the part where the interviewer clearly asks him whether he'd disavow the kool kids klub. He refuses to say anything because he's counting on a couple tens of thousands of white supremacist votes.

He disavowed Dukes later when he was pressed about it after he had figured out who he was. He stuff out "the kool kids klub?" in the last 30 seconds of the interview while Annoying Orange was in the middle of his sentence telling the interviewer for like the 3rd time that he doesn't know who Duke was, and then tried to make it look like Annoying Orange was answering a question about the kool kids klub when he clearly wasn't.

but conflating an entire ethnic group with murderers and rapists is a totally safe assumption? Man you're loving stupid for buying what this guy is saying.

What are you referring too?

I'm not 'buying' anything, the principle behind condemning some random dude you don't know anything about on international live television just because someone fed you some ambiguous accusation of racism is plain ridiculous, especially when you're campaigning for president.

He disavowed Dukes later when he was pressed about it after he had figured out who he was. He stuff out "the kool kids klub?" in the last 30 seconds of the interview while Annoying Orange was in the middle of his sentence telling the interviewer for like the 3rd time that he doesn't know who Duke was, and then tried to make it look like Annoying Orange was answering a question about the kool kids klub when he clearly wasn't.
So you're telling me that he's running for POTUS but doesn't know what a Grand Wizard is? Bullstuff.

This was a complete CYA moment. The only reason he's back-tracked on any of his excuses is because the backlash has been so large over the past couple of days.

What are you referring too?
You've got to be kidding me. I'm referring to the original tribal remark about Mexicans that Annoying Orange kicked off his candidacy with.

I'm not 'buying' anything, the principle behind condemning some random dude you don't know anything about on international live television just because someone fed you some ambiguous accusation of racism is plain ridiculous, especially when you're campaigning for president.
It was perfectly clear that he was a white supremacist. The interviewer states that he was the leader of the kool kids klub from the very start of the interview.

Quote
Interviewer: I want to ask you about the Anti-Defamation League which this week called on you to publicly condemn, unequivocally, the racism of former kool kids klub Grand Wizard Gandalf, who recently said that voting against you would be 'treason against your heritage'...

Annoying Orange: Well, just so you understand, I don't know anything about Gandalf