Animal testing: it's unfortunate that it's done, but I don't really see any alternatives except for test on humans, or live (which "live" in some cases can mean "die") without them
School uniforms: I've really never had an opinion on this.
Church exemption: I see no issue with it as long as it's done fairly. The idea behind the establishment clause is that the government should not favor one religion. As long as all religious (and non-religious) groups are treated equally in regards to tax exemption, there really isn't any establishment.
I have however heard that there's specific restrictions on things that non-profits can't do, and that some churches are violating them and not having non-profit status revoked, in that case they should be taxed
- students oppose uniforms
This is kind of a nonsensical argument.
"I oppose them because I oppose them"
I'm not arguing against the stance, I just don't get this argument.
The Church my family used to go recently had plans to build a million-dollar complex next to the main building. Emphasis on million dollar, they were practically bragging about it. No non-profit organization has that kind of money, and it should pay taxes according to its income.
There's plenty of non-profits with a ton of income. They're businesses like any other, just a slightly different goal.
I just looked up the first non-profit I could think of, United Way, specifically Greater Twin Cities United Way since that's where I live, and found that their CEO is paid over $300k/yr
