Author Topic: FlyDubai Flight 981 Crash  (Read 1323 times)

http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/flydubai-flight-fz981-crashes-at-russias-rostov-on-don-airport-killing-62-people/ar-BBqDzHq?li=AAgfYrC

MSN has always been a piece of stuff, so the key facts:

FlyDubai Flight 981, a Boeing 737 under the callsign FZ981, crashed during landing at Rostov-on Don Airport in Russia. 62 Dead (55 PASS, 7 CREW), 0 Survivors. All members were nationals of Russia, Ukraine, India or Uzebekistan.

If you're unfamiliar, there's a website called FlightRadar24 which lets you track almost all aircraft in the sky in (nearly) real-time. Studying the data from FR24, FZ981 made several go-arounds during bad weather conditions, frequently losing or increasing speed and altitude. There's no voice recording, so we can't yet determine (without the Russian authorities studying the data recorders and roosterpit voice recorders) if this was due to pilot error exacerbated by the bad conditions, or if this was a technical fault that the pilots were attempting to control.

Captured video footage showed the plane exploding on impact.

And sure, this may not be the biggest air crash ever, but I enjoy studying and discussing air accidents so I'm excited to see what the final report is.


I mean, losing altitude with varying speeds isn't unusual for an approach. I bet they were shooting a CAT III with the autopilot if it was low vis. and the stupid thing slammed it into the ground.

Well the roosterpit Voice Recorder can't be as bad as Western Airlines Flight 2605.


Everyone who died was brown or a commie bastard sooooooooo

Thanks for the report though I didn't know about FlightRadar24.


no one cared who i was until i put on the mask

Why is it whenever these things happen, they always blame it on human error or a mechanical failure then when none of those things match its usually always a terrorist.


Seriously it was probably a terrorist attack but for some reason that's always the last thing that they will assume.

Why is it whenever these things happen, they always blame it on human error or a mechanical failure then when none of those things match its usually always a terrorist.


Seriously it was probably a terrorist attack but for some reason that's always the last thing that they will assume.
because human/mechanical errors are a lot more common than a terrorist

plus less backlash if it gets reported as an error first and it turns out to be false rather then the other way around
« Last Edit: March 19, 2016, 04:39:45 PM by e-maxx »

because human/mechanical errors are a lot more common than a terrorist

plus less backlash if it gets reported as an error first and it turns out to be false rather then the other way around

Being a terror is human error

Seriously it was probably a terrorist attack but for some reason that's always the last thing that they will assume.
Terrorist Attacks account for an EXTREMELY small percent of air incidents, and most of those are failed. They just aren't very common, especially with the new security laws in place. This aircraft left DUBAI Airport. I don't know how much you know about Dubai, but they have one of the strictest air security regimes in the world (because they're commonly used by people from nations like Africa with dangerous populations).

As evidenced by the video and the flight tracker data, it exploded on impact, which means it was still carrying fuel and hit the ground with force. As Mikoyan said, it's not uncommon for pilots to keep toggling their speed and altitude while trying to get the correct approach vector. And as the report also said, visibility was poor and there was bad weather conditions.

Personally? FlyDubai is one of the cheaper air carriers that hires low-skilled pilots looking for experience before they can move into the bigger flights and companies. I believe the pilots probably were inexperienced and simply failed to read the situation correctly, possibly assuming they were higher up than they actually were. There have been incidents in the past were crew incorrectly read the altimeter (the equipment that displays your current height, or "altitude") or where the weather veins on the aircraft were sufficiently blocked/damaged and prevented the altimeter from working correctly. It could also have been as Mikoyan said; the autopilot may be to blame.

Boeing has said they're happy to assist with the investigation give that it's their aircraft, and one might assume from that they're believe its a possible technical error.