Author Topic: Each generation of children seem to get worse each time.  (Read 9835 times)

The golden rule cannot be applied in cases of punishment, though. The point of punishment is to do something to someone that they don't want done to them to discourage behavior. I might consider this to be a bit more viable if you were talking about the punishment of a reasonable adult, but we're talking kids here, and let's be honest, none of them are going to want to be punished in any fashion.
But the point I'm trying to make here is that it's not loving necessary at all and is incredibly loving lazy as a parenting and conditioning method. Children are not your pets. That kind of punishment only creates a larger emotional gap between you and them. It doesn't tell them that you care at all: it just says that you'll just be arbitrarily spanked if you do this arbitrary thing that you don't understand is an arbitrarily bad thing.

But the point I'm trying to make here is that it's not loving necessary at all and is incredibly loving lazy as a parenting and conditioning method. Children are not your pets. That kind of punishment only creates a larger emotional gap between you and them. It doesn't tell them that you care at all: it just says that you'll just be arbitrarily spanked if you do this arbitrary thing that you don't understand is an arbitrarily bad thing.
Even if you explain to them what they did wrong, gave them one spanking as punishment (Which is better than getting their stuff taken away for a month, leaving them bored out of their minds) and then hug it out and exchanging I love yous and etc, that would still be the wrong thing to do?

The golden rule cannot be applied in cases of punishment, though. The point of punishment is to do something to someone that they don't want done to them to discourage behavior. I might consider this to be a bit more viable if you were talking about the punishment of a reasonable adult, but we're talking kids here, and let's be honest, none of them are going to want to be punished in any fashion.
The golden rule does still apply in punishment, but in a different form. Rather than "would I want this done to me" it'd be "would I deserve this if I did such crime"

Here's the big difference between "abuse" and "spanking." It's when you draw a clear line between that which, on a physical level, inflicts discomfort versus harm, and on a mental level, causes trauma versus teaching.
spanking can still cause trauma depending on the environment, context, frequency, etc. if you're saying otherwise

it's a psychological question that's too complex to narrow down to a single instance of punishment

it's not loving necessary at all and is incredibly loving lazy as a parenting and conditioning method.
this is entirely wrong in my case: i was definitely a kid who needed to be given them hands

i'd always find a way to exploit technicalities or just be plain difficult with my parents. I could block out the sound of their voice or just not pay attention, but I couldn't ignore or block a spanking with a stick; I often gave them no choice but to give me a punishment that would actually work, and through the pain(not damage, there's a big difference) I learned that you'll have to face the consequences of your actions one way or another eventually. As a kid, I was able to understand why they were pushed to the point of getting physical. I don't really like my parents now and they know it, but that's because of the lack of attention and care they put towards me during my preteen/teen years - particularly when compared to my siblings - but I did make it clear to them that I was glad they beat my stubborn ass. If they hadn't, to name a few possible outcomes, I'd personally probably be pretentious, inconsiderate, and/or self-righteous, but I certainly wouldn't have respect for authority if I wasn't given a punishment that I knew I couldn't find a way to make the best out of

my 2 cents

Even if you explain to them what they did wrong, gave them one spanking as punishment (Which is better than getting their stuff taken away for a month, leaving them bored out of their minds) and then hug it out and exchanging I love yous and etc, that would still be the wrong thing to do?
...Just don't spank them in the first place? Creating a reason to be sorry in the first place is stupid. Honest to god, when they know what they did is wrong, they'll already feel bad enough from your disappointment or frustration. The important thing here is that, for them to even care about your frustration, your relationship has to already not be a broken mess. Like I said before: trust, communication. Important elements in a parent-child relationship.

spanking can still cause trauma depending on the environment, context, frequency, etc. if you're saying otherwise

it's a psychological question that's too complex to narrow down to a single instance of punishment
"It depends" when it comes to spanking is a broken argument anyway. You're hitting your kid's ass. If your goal is to condition them, you'll have to hit their ass hard enough for them to remember it, otherwise you'll just look like a handicap. So in the end, regardless of any varying degree, their ass hurts. It doesn't suddenly become more okay when their ass hurts slightly less - it's dumb to make that implication.

"It depends" when it comes to spanking is a broken argument anyway. You're hitting your kid's ass. If your goal is to condition them, you'll have to hit their ass hard enough for them to remember it, otherwise you'll just look like a handicap. So in the end, regardless of any varying degree, their ass hurts. It doesn't suddenly become more okay when their ass hurts slightly less - it's dumb to make that implication.
i was just talking about the potential argument that spanking directly equates to an abusive environment when that isn't necessarily the case. of course, abusive parents would probably favour punishments like spankings

A child hung himself due to being "traumatized" because his parents took away his Wii system for a week.

If they spanked him he could have still been alive.

A child hung himself due to being "traumatized" because his parents took away his Wii system for a week.

If they spanked him he could have still been alive.
this is one of the best posts you've ever made but i'll go ahead and say that if a child is suicidal a spanking isn't going to save them lol

A child hung himself due to being "traumatized" because his parents took away his Wii system for a week.

If they spanked him he could have still been alive.
one day a little girl named debbie hangded herselmf with a rope............. .
if rope didnt exist debbbe would still ber here today!

Even if you explain to them what they did wrong, gave them one spanking as punishment (Which is better than getting their stuff taken away for a month, leaving them bored out of their minds) and then hug it out and exchanging I love yous and etc, that would still be the wrong thing to do?
This is basically how I was punished for my most extreme crimes as a young kid. Although physical punishment (slap on the bum, or mustard on the tongue) was very rare.
I know it's anecdotal, but I grew up to be pretty balanced and I love my parents. I wouldn't get anywhere close to calling them bad parents just because they had gently hit me before.

Honest to god, when they know what they did is wrong, they'll already feel bad enough from your disappointment or frustration.
As an occassionally naughty child with two much more naughty brothers I can tell you this is certainly not always the case.
Sometimes kids are stuffs and the fact that mum is upset is not enough for them to know they were in the wrong. Punishments, of various kinds are often necessary.

A child hung himself due to being "traumatized" because his parents took away his Wii system for a week.

If they spanked him he could have still been alive.
It's a shame you weren't spanked less.

this is entirely wrong in my case: i was definitely a kid who needed to be given them hands

i'd always find a way to exploit technicalities or just be plain difficult with my parents. I could block out the sound of their voice or just not pay attention, but I couldn't ignore or block a spanking with a stick; I often gave them no choice but to give me a punishment that would actually work, and through the pain(not damage, there's a big difference) I learned that you'll have to face the consequences of your actions one way or another eventually. As a kid, I was able to understand why they were pushed to the point of getting physical. I don't really like my parents now and they know it, but that's because of the lack of attention and care they put towards me during my preteen/teen years - particularly when compared to my siblings - but I did make it clear to them that I was glad they beat my stubborn ass. If they hadn't, to name a few possible outcomes, I'd personally probably be pretentious, inconsiderate, and/or self-righteous, but I certainly wouldn't have respect for authority if I wasn't given a punishment that I knew I couldn't find a way to make the best out of

my 2 cents
Reasonable. But this line here is important:

I don't really like my parents now and they know it, but that's because of the lack of attention and care they put towards me during my preteen/teen years - particularly when compared to my siblings -

Again, the argument is not that spanking is ineffective, and you understanding now why they spanked you, or respecting them for it, is you losing your perspective of being a kid. But we can disregard all that when take into account the simple fact that your relationship with your parents isn't healthy. Not even just because of the spanking, just from pure neglect, and seeming cold and uncaring when the time to talk did come around.

This is the point I'm trying to make, people. This is the end goal. I love my mother to death and I wouldn't love her nearly as much had she been rough with me as a child. I absolutely cherish my relationship with her. If I ever did anything wrong, she wouldn't yell at me or condemn me for it, she'd just tell me what I did wrong or otherwise express her discontent. I'd apologize, acknowledge my wrong doing, and move on from there. I was a kid - I'd have no other choice. If your parents leave you alone when you know you're doing something wrong, the guilt just eats away at you, you know?

But, somewhat meaningless introspection aside: the goal isn't to just make your kids behave right. Being a good parent is wholely maintaining a healthy relationship with your child in the process. Spanking does not do this. Sure, you can hug and make up after the first time, but after the other times, are you really going to be convinced that they're just not spanking you over and over for the hell of it? Would you not hold at least the slightest bit of contempt for that? You already know what you're doing is wrong, so why the hell are they slapping my ass!?

...Perspective, people.

i was just talking about the potential argument that spanking directly equates to an abusive environment when that isn't necessarily the case. of course, abusive parents would probably favour punishments like spankings
Wasn't targeting anyone with that. Only wanted to make the point that "varying degrees of spanking" practically only means anything to the legal system.

I know it's anecdotal, but I grew up to be pretty balanced and I love my parents. I wouldn't get anywhere close to calling them bad parents just because they had gently hit me before.

As an occassionally naughty child with two much more naughty brothers I can tell you this is certainly not always the case.
Sometimes kids are stuffs and the fact that mum is upset is not enough for them to know they were in the wrong. Punishments, of various kinds are often necessary.
You might have missed this part:
Quote
The important thing here is that, for them to even care about your frustration, your relationship has to already not be a broken mess. Like I said before: trust, communication. Important elements in a parent-child relationship.

The golden rule does still apply in punishment, but in a different form. Rather than "would I want this done to me" it'd be "would I deserve this if I did such crime"
As I said, children will not understand this though.

spanking can still cause trauma depending on the environment, context, frequency, etc. if you're saying otherwise

it's a psychological question that's too complex to narrow down to a single instance of punishment
Fully aware, I've mentioned it several times (see: blanket statements). Here I'm talking about it on more of the parent's side of things.

But the point I'm trying to make here is that it's not loving necessary at all and is incredibly loving lazy as a parenting and conditioning method. Children are not your pets. That kind of punishment only creates a larger emotional gap between you and them. It doesn't tell them that you care at all: it just says that you'll just be arbitrarily spanked if you do this arbitrary thing that you don't understand is an arbitrarily bad thing.
Ok, look, I'm not disagreeing that spanking CAN be bad. Let's get that out of the way. But generalizing is the wrong answer. Our world isn't black and white.

It's not lazy, it's different.
Nobody said they were pets. I don't consider myself to be my parents' pet. They don't see me that way. Not really sure what you're trying to say here.
Punishment in general creates an emotional gap. Why do you think there's so much tension between teens and parents? You seem to be mostly focused on the effects of spanking, but as I've said, you can't expect people on the receiving end (in this case, kids) to take any form of punishment in the same manner as their peers. Each form will take its toll on any given individual in a completely different way. As I said previously, for me, being yelled at was far, FAR worse than getting a spanking. It hurt me mentally far more than spanking hurt both mentally and physically.

After I would get yelled, I would resent my parents. After I got spanked, I would just be generally upset. I cannot stress this enough. These sort of things CANNOT be generalized.

Now, from the perspective of it being wrong... well, that's up to the opinion of each and every person. We've clearly and distinctly drawn the line between our views; you find it wrong, I think it's ok in moderation and depending on the situation. But let's dig a bit deeper.
  • On a legal level, is it unlawful to spank your child? As long as it doesn't cross the line and tread in the territory of child abuse, then no.
  • Can "normal" spanking become child abuse? Yes. I won't argue that. If a parent spanks their child under normal circumstances and the child reacts in a traumatized manner, should the parent continue? No. If they do, despite the fact that it's "normal" spanking, then it's still abusive.
  • Is it morally wrong to spank a child? To some, maybe. Morals are subjective. But I'd feel bad making a kid stay inside and disallowed from playing with his friends for a week. Ask yourself, as a recipient, has it, or would it, make me a better or worse person. As the punisher, ask yourself, will this affect my child for better or for worse in the long run? If the answer to these is a negative one, then yes, it is wrong for you. But pushing that sentimentality onto everyone is also wrong. We're not committing murder here - heck, as someone who WAS spanked going out to someone who wasn't, it wasn't abusive or even "all that bad."

This is the point I'm trying to make, people. This is the end goal. I love my mother to death and I wouldn't love her nearly as much had she been rough with me as a child. I absolutely cherish my relationship with her. If I ever did anything wrong, she wouldn't yell at me or condemn me for it, she'd just tell me what I did wrong or otherwise express her discontent. I'd apologize, acknowledge my wrong doing, and move on from there. I was a kid - I'd have no other choice. If your parents leave you alone when you know you're doing something wrong, the guilt just eats away at you, you know?

But, somewhat meaningless introspection aside: the goal isn't to just make your kids behave right. Being a good parent is wholely maintaining a healthy relationship with your child in the process. Spanking does not do this. Sure, you can hug and make up after the first time, but after the other times, are you really going to be convinced that they're just not spanking you over and over for the hell of it? Would you not hold at least the slightest bit of contempt for that? You already know what you're doing is wrong, so why the hell are they slapping my ass!?

...Perspective, people.
Again, too black and white, man. You're implying someone can't have a healthy relationship with their child if they spank them. And again, that's wrong. My brother and I disprove that by existing.

As for repetitious spanking, well, we're just assuming now that A) a parent spanks a child for everything requiring punishment, and B) that the child is breaking the rules all the time. Obviously, if the child is doing stuff over and over, and spanking them over and over isn't working, then OF COURSE something needs to change. It's insanity - expecting a different result from the same circumstances, every time.

Ok, look, I'm not disagreeing that spanking CAN be bad. Let's get that out of the way. But generalizing is the wrong answer. Our world isn't black and white.
Our world most definitely isn't black and white. However, I'm speaking given that I have one specific end goal as a parent: to keep a healthy relationship with a mutual understanding between myself and my child, without resorting to purposeful infliction of physical or emotional pain, effects that can lead to a damaged relationship while they're growing up.

When we take that into account, there is a black, and there is a white. Knowing this, you can then take conscious, logical steps to having a healthy, loving bond between you and your children.

It's not lazy, it's different.
It's both. Given that there are other ways to teach your child right or wrong that don't involve hitting them, if it's not lazy, it's irresponsible, and lacking perspective.

Nobody said they were pets. I don't consider myself to be my parents' pet. They don't see me that way. Not really sure what you're trying to say here.
A statement for effect, nothing more.

Punishment in general creates an emotional gap. Why do you think there's so much tension between teens and parents? You seem to be mostly focused on the effects of spanking, but as I've said, you can't expect people on the receiving end (in this case, kids) to take any form of punishment in the same manner as their peers. Each form will take its toll on any given individual in a completely different way. As I said previously, for me, being yelled at was far, FAR worse than getting a spanking. It hurt me mentally far more than spanking hurt both mentally and physically.

After I would get yelled, I would resent my parents. After I got spanked, I would just be generally upset. I cannot stress this enough. These sort of things CANNOT be generalized.
I never wanted to suggest punishment as a whole should be avoided, but one should strive to resort to it as little as one can. In particular, any form of punishment that would make you seem uncaring to a growing child.

This isn't going to be possible a lot of the time. Parenting is hard, and people make mistakes. It becomes an issue when you acknowledge this mistake as a valid non-destructive form of parenting that can even be used in moderation at all. You walk away from it feeling as though you did the right thing, and the child becomes... used to it? Used to having someone slap their ass whenever they did something wrong?

That's an awful world to grow up in. Just... talk to your kids. Make sure they know you still love them. If they did something wrong and didn't know it was wrong, tell them why. If they knew it was wrong, there's a reason behind it. Understand that reason and lead them to a path of not doing that thing. Try to make them understand why they shouldn't do that thing. Help them and guide them. That's the job of a parent when you really get down to it.

There are other forms of punishment worse than spanking, so I'll just automatically condemn all of them too. Just spanking shouldn't be considered here. I don't want spanking to be the main topic of debate here. I want people to think less about how they can make their child do the right thing. I want people to think about how they can treat their child in a loving way.

If the kid ends up fine in life and they were spanked, that doesn't mean that spanking is just a fine thing to do. There were people who were loveually abused as a child and live fulfilling lives... you know where I'm going with this. It's an extreme brown townogy to use here but still valid when we consider this: individual parenting methods can be grouped in a "Yes" and a "No" category depending on your goal as a parent. The more of "Yes" you do, the better. The problem is when you consistently and consciously reach into the "No" category. You shouldn't be doing this thing, but you continue to use it as a method that damages your relationship with your child. Offsetting it with a bunch of "Yes"es is not the answer. Being mature, acknowledging it as a mistake, and properly talking and bonding with your child, then possibly apologizing to them in the end is the answer.

...I digress. Like I said, parenting is hard. If you can get off with good kids by dipping into "No" every now and again, I won't blame you. I'd even see myself doing that given the right scenario. But you absolutely have to recognize the human element. You have to be aware of your actions. The whole of it really just has to be thinking about your child, and putting yourself in their shoes, and saying you grew up just fine given negative reinforcement just isn't a valid reason to justify your parents' unruly treatment towards yourself.

Now, from the perspective of it being wrong... well, that's up to the opinion of each and every person. We've clearly and distinctly drawn the line between our views; you find it wrong, I think it's ok in moderation and depending on the situation. But let's dig a bit deeper.
  • no
  • forget
  • off
On the legal level, I'm unconcerned. On the moral level, I'm unconcerned. I know it might seem hypocritical to set the goal of happiness then try to throw morals out the window at the same time, but I just try to think of others as people, and try to keep their thoughts and opinions in mind when I make actions and judgement. I don't think it's wrong to apply that perspective to parenting as well.

Again, too black and white, man. You're implying someone can't have a healthy relationship with their child if they spank them. And again, that's wrong. My brother and I disprove that by existing.
I'll apologize if I made that implication. I'll correct that statement in saying that it's not the way one should be going about it. And again, that and everything else I've said when given the above condition: a healthy relationship with your child. I don't like black and whites as you've put them, and I don't like blanket statements, but the bottom line for me is this: The majority of kids who grow up to believe their parents are the people who are supposed to love them and treat them with care absolutely should not be subjected to purposefully inflicted physical or emotional pain in place of proper communication.

It's not complicated. Don't hit your child, and don't make them feel like stuff. Help them. Love them. Let them know you care. Be there for them whenever you can.

loving STOP WRITING NOVELS TO REPLY TO EACHOTHER AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA SO MUCH WORDS