Author Topic: Let's all shut down free speech by using free speech!!  (Read 4291 times)


Social Darwinism's already kicking into effect and people are refusing to breed with these monstrosities.

These monstrosities are already aware of this and already put in their own measures to ensure breeding.


You are now a transphobe if you don't have love with a transmission even if they have a full love change.

You are now a family man if you don't have love with gays.

You are now loveist if you don't have love with women.

You are now an ageist if you don't have love with old people.

You are now a horrible stufflord if you don't have love with fat people.

etc


You are now a horrible stufflord if you don't have love with fat people.

etc
I wonder how stufflord feels about this

"Anarcho-Communism"

What?


Found the video I was looking for. Added subtitles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMQV-Bluc8

Honestly, being confident about your appearance is a great thing. Most fat people aren't.

But THIS stuff...
"Anarcho-Communism"

What?

She claims what she says is free speech but she is a communist, exact opposite of free speech.

should we have some sort of "Involuntary Admission" to a "Rehabilitiation Facility"? Or should we take them behind the chemical sheds
Don't act like them.

"Anarcho-Communism"

unabbr=The very nature of Communism strays very far from any kind of Anarchism so in other words, she's making up yet another word. What?
It's an actual thing, and yes, it's what is considered to be the "ideal" form of communism, one without a state. However, without any way to enforce equal distribution beyond a contradictory mob rule, it is not feasible.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 05:41:10 PM by Gatysh »

Because communism worked so well for every country that used it.

Because communism worked so well for every country that used it.
"b-b-but they didn't do it right! when WE do it it'll be good!!!!!!"

It's an actual thing, and yes, it's what is considered to be the "ideal" form of communism, one without a state. However, without any way to enforce equal distribution beyond a contradictory mob rule, it is not feasible.
There's a difference in computing human error within communism and making the dumb mistake of thinking that everyone will be in solidarity and distribute wealth evenly.  Furthermore, Communism by its very nature requires a large governing body to see that its philosophies are carried out regardless of public opinion at any one moment.  It's beyond wishful thinking.  Thus, anarcho-communism is abstract thought, not just infeasible.

Nobody should yell at Milo like that

Oh and Christina too


Well, we can rest easy knowing that she can't get any sway with literally any law entity.

She's a filthy communist.