Apparently illegal immigrants are now getting accepted to vote against Annoying Orange.

[Lord Tony®]

Jokes on the illegals when the electoral college votes against what they want.

[Ad Bot]

[Rally]

uh, excuse me pal but this source is wrong and I'm about to call an ad heminem on your ass if you don't sort your stuff out

This is a bendy straw man phallus-e. get owned bro

[Tayasaurus]

this is add heminonim!!

um excuse me its add homo M&M's

[Epicduke]

it's actually ad hemroids

[Frequency]

well are there any objectively credible news sources?

[XR-7]

well are there any objectively credible news sources?

The Blockland Forums

[Frequency]

The Blockland Forums

well I'm not gonna lie I get a lot of my news from here lol

[Toxicology]

here comes the liberal agenda

[sir dooble]

well are there any objectively credible news sources?

Sometimes, depending on the topics at hand.

The BBC is pretty good at times for being objective, and I think that for practically all things it reports on it's highly credible with a lot of fact-checking, but for more political news, it can sometimes be slightly biased, or at least appear that way. Often it's bias is expressed in how much coverage it gives to an event/person, rather than portraying things positively/negatively.

But of course, you have to remember that each individual article is written by a person, who has their own views and biases, and the article is edited by people who have their own views and biases too, so any corporation can put out a news piece that is biased one way or the other.

[RTBARCHIVE]

homonym****

you got a source for this?????

[plad101]

you got a source for this?????

Do you have a source for his source?

[RTBARCHIVE]

Do you have a source for his source?

woah woah sir please provide valid source credentials before asking for a source!

[otto-san]

well are there any objectively credible news sources?

not really. though most mainstream outlets don't have much bias in their actual reports, they would likely have a bias in choosing which stories to cover

i still find it hilarious how large a market for bullstuff there is. there are so many niche websites to fit whatever specific bias you have it's no wonder there are so many people that seem to have tunnel vision

[patton360]

Sometimes, depending on the topics at hand.

The BBC is pretty good at times for being objective, and I think that for practically all things it reports on it's highly credible with a lot of fact-checking, but for more political news, it can sometimes be slightly biased, or at least appear that way. Often it's bias is expressed in how much coverage it gives to an event/person, rather than portraying things positively/negatively.

But of course, you have to remember that each individual article is written by a person, who has their own views and biases, and the article is edited by people who have their own views and biases too, so any corporation can put out a news piece that is biased one way or the other.

BBC is pretty neutral in my experience(as an american). I feel like a lot of the time that we loose the fact that the news and facts are still in most/all of the major news sources despite how they present the information. Using a news site's "bias" as a way to make it totally incredible is frankly stupid. if one person is reporting something in this day and age, there's a very low chance reporting is actually incorrect, and if it is, social media will let everyone know very quickly.

[Tayasaurus]

here comes the liberal agenda

Ipquarx is the least liberal by comparison to some of you guys