gigantic loving riot at donald Annoying Orange rally in the city i live in

[Akio-]

your entire argument is a figment of your imagination. Hate speech and fighting words are very real things and are actually illegal, especially when said/aimed directly at a person.

in the real world, we call that 'harassment'.
are you gonna try to do this with me again path? you're wrong literally every single time.

[Ad Bot]

[Path]

in the real world, we call that 'harassment'.
are you gonna try to do this with me again path? you're wrong literally every single time.

yes, and hate speech can be a form of harassment. Therefore 'hate speech absolutely does not exist'

[MoltenKitten]

Hate speech exists but, saying you won't date someone because they are a land whale is not hate speech

[Akio-]

yes, and hate speech can be a form of harassment. Therefore 'hate speech absolutely does not exist'

Let's brown townyze the definition of 'hate speech'

You can tell in this sentence alone that it's an SJW construct -- probably why Path is so eager to defend it.
Once again, nobody has the right to not be offended. Hearing something that you don't like and labeling it 'hate speech' is an immature way of avoiding confrontation. It's called being unable to substantiate an argument for yourself.

[Path]

Let's brown townyze the definition of 'hate speech'

You can tell in this sentence alone that it's an SJW construct -- probably why Path is so eager to defend it.

Wow. I never knew the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was enforcing such an SJW policy. Man, I never knew the UN would follow SJW-created definitions. I never knew countries like Denmark and Finland made hate speech illegal! Maybe those countries are filthy SJWs and are just offending by everything since they're SJWs and clearly can't defend themselves from insults.

How could you have the loving audacity to promote your idea as fact through personal incredulity AND THEN defend it by saying i'm always wrong when I argue against you?

You can tell in this sentence alone that it's an SJW construct

That's the google definition. I'm talking about the legal definition of fighting words and hate speech.

[Akio-]

Wow. I never knew the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was enforcing such an SJW policy. Man, I never knew the UN would follow SJW-created definitions. I never knew countries like Denmark and Finland made hate speech illegal! Maybe those countries are filthy SJWs and are just offending by everything since they're SJWs

If anyone didn't know what I meant by being unable to substantiate an argument, here you go.
These are areas of the world where the refugee crCIA is in full effect. They are limited free speech there because it's politically incorrect to have a negative opinion on refugees.

How could you have the loving audacity to promote your idea as fact through personal incredulity AND THEN defend it by saying i'm always wrong when I argue against you?

You are objectively wrong and I bet there's only 3 or 4 people here that would disagree with that.

That's the google definition. I'm talking about the legal definition of fighting words and hate speech.

Show me the legal definition.

[Path]

If anyone didn't know what I meant by being unable to substantiate an argument, here you go.

Speak for yourself. Your entire 'argument' can be summarized by "I think this is how it works so that's how it works"

at this point you're just lowkey trolling

[Akio-]

So you admit that you're wrong? Wow, this is probably the fastest time now that you've disregarded a post and cried "trolling".

[Path]

So you admit that you're wrong? Wow, this is probably the fastest time now that you've disregarded a post and cried "trolling".

are you gonna try to do this with me again path? you're wrong literally every single time.

You can tell in this sentence alone that it's an SJW construct -- probably why Path is so eager to defend it.

oh forget off

half of your posts have been "this doesn't exist because I don't think it does" and the other half has been "path is doing x wrong". I can take the first half, but the second half is just your hate boner doing the talking

[Akio-]

Alright Path, I'm sorry for hurting your feelings.

[Torin]

what the forget happened in here what

[Pastrey Crust]

Reminds me of the Uber riots in my city. It gives them free propaganda. Silly cabs, they never learn.

[rambo1220]

If anyone didn't know what I meant by being unable to substantiate an argument, here you go.

Wow. I never knew the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was enforcing such an SJW policy. Man, I never knew the UN would follow SJW-created definitions. I never knew countries like Denmark and Finland made hate speech illegal! Maybe those countries are filthy SJWs and are just offending by everything since they're SJWs and clearly can't defend themselves from insults.

no that looks like a pretty good argument to me

[Path]

no that looks like a pretty good argument to me

inb4 akio calls you an SJW white knight

[Akio-]

inb4 akio calls you an SJW white knight

you having fun hiding behind a single statement?
not like i didn't address that argument anyways. that's when path starting whining and quit.