politician greets parliament in 60 different genders

[Akio-]

it's different when their loveual identity isn't real

[Ad Bot]

[shitlord]

[otto-san]

LGBT use to be about loveual preference but now it's both gender and loveual preference now.


Speaking of which "demiloveual" is a loving gender but the definition is that you won't have love with someone unless you get to know them. So these people claim it's a loving gender but really it's a loveual preference.


So loveual preferences are genders, genders are loveual preferences. I don't know what you expect.

i know it's tony but some of this stuff he's saying are things people actually believe

nobody's actually saying that stuff, afaik it's really only people being confused. the difference between gender and loveual orientation is incredibly clear, they just both fall under the LGBT umbrella. (also the T literally stands for trans, it was never only about loveual orientation)

[McZealot]

it's different when their loveual identity isn't real

how is it not real? a loveual identity is real as soon as someone identifies as it. that's the whole point.

[Akio-]

how is it not real? a loveual identity is real as soon as someone identifies as it. that's the whole point.

If that were true, loveual identity would be completely meaningless

[McZealot]

when that becomes true, loveual identity would be completely meaningless

If someone's loveual identity or any other form of identity is meaningless to you just because it's uncommon, you must also refuse to recognize Zoroastrians as a religious group?

[Akio-]

If someone's loveual identity or any other form of identity is meaningless to you because it's uncommon, you're a piece of stuff.

that's not what I was implying at all lol.

[C-Zech Chrome Ind.]

The governments make provisions for physical things that actually exist and are real problems rather than wasting money on confused superficial ideals.

They don't have an infinite supply of the green stuff to please everyone's delusions, you know.

[otto-san]

that's not what I was implying at all lol.

it might be that you're both talking about different things because "loveual identity" can be understood by some people as either gender or loveual orientation

so it'd probably be a good idea to clarify that

[Akio-]

to clarify, I'm not talking about loveual orientation ^.

[McZealot]

to clarify, I'm not talking about loveual orientation ^.

I'm going by the actual definition of the word.

loveual identity is how one thinks of oneself in terms of to whom one is romantically or loveually attracted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loveual_identity

[Akio-]

so if ur gay or bi, yeah idc about that it's real.

[c]

itt muh identity

[Alternat¡ve]

based steffen Königer! a shame that no politican in the U.S has his balls. Sad!

[Red Spy]

I loveually identify as the Empire State Building