Author Topic: Putin to "DESTROY" CIA by deploying Russia's biggest warship to the med  (Read 4709 times)

what if his 6th grade teacher was called lord tony
actually he was called taboo

Remember kids, if we nuke Russia or they nuke us, its bye bye to planet earth.

As Einstein said "I don't know what we will use to fight WWIII but I know we will fight WWIIII with sticks and stones."
"wwiiii" lmao

you can't bash someone's source when you're not giving one yourself
for all i know your source could be your imaginary friend
And then it'll be edited back by somebody else. They watch the thing like hawks.

As for what keeps Russia from nuking us, it's... our nukes.
I would link a source but I know you guys won't read it, so:

"Mutual assured destruction or mutually assured destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two or more opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. It is based on the theory of deterrence, which holds that the threat of using strong weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of those same weapons. The strategy is a form of Nash equilibrium in which, once armed, neither side has any incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm."

As for what keeps Russia from nuking us, it's... our nukes.
And global politics? Nuking the United States would mean receiving sanctions and retaliatory strikes from practically every devloped nation on Earth, which would cause the Russian government to dissolve.

Say what you want about globalism, but it sure prevents people from outright nuking each other.

The cold war never ended. There was no peace treaty with Russia.
I am starting to think you aren't 26

I am starting to think you aren't 26

I'm aware there is no war.

The cold war was a conflict. This conflict was never resolved.

How the forget else am I suppose to word "Cold War" without implying war because that's literally the loving name.


"The cold conflict"

How the forget else am I suppose to word "Cold War" without implying war because that's literally the loving name.


"The cold conflict"
The Chilly Confrontation

"The Daily Star"
This just averted me from the article - they're not a trusted source whatsoever, neither is another one of your stories (The Sun.)
Putin has already been urged multiple times to partake in actions like these and other countries such as France have had the idea of sending over ships.

To any people who don't know about journalism in the UK, The Daily Star, The Sun and the Daily Mail are all examples of stuffey newspapers written by all-round piece of stuff people like the infamous Katie Hopkins. They are advertised as cheap newspapers and constantly compete on pricing because they are read by people who probably have little to no education in life and have working-class lifestyles. The Sun is picked up mainly because of the fact it had Page 3 which was essentially for horny males who would never account to anything in their lives. It was just jampacked with pictures of women in bikinis. It's also scandalous because it framed the police and made up stuff in situations like the Hillsborough disaster.The Daily Star even brags about its pricing and then proceeds to do the maths for its own readers (i.e "The Daily Star is 45p cheaper than the Daily Mail because you definitely did not learn simple subtraction at school considering you read these papers!) And this post would be even loving longer if I started on the Daily Mail.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2016, 10:24:32 AM by ChappersTeddy »

"The Daily Star"
This just averted me from the article - they're not a trusted source whatsoever, neither is another one of your stories (The Sun.)

Someone posts a source and then there is this guy saying the source is not good enough.

It's never good enough.

Someone posts a source and then there is this guy saying the source is not good enough.

It's never good enough.
I wouldn't mind if people actually posted sources which can be even remotely trusted.

I wouldn't mind if people actually posted sources which can be even remotely trusted.

Post your source or don't discredit his then bro.

Post your source or don't discredit his then bro.
The stories I used cited sources. Click on the links, bro. I have done my research by the way, all the news articles I found were from the aforementioned sources that I cannot trust.

Man, Putin sure makes himself look like a big guy

Someone posts a source and then there is this guy saying the source is not good enough.

It's never good enough.
It would be good enough if a trusted source was given in the first place.