The new ghostbusters has critic reviews and

[TheBrickBuilder]

they aren't that bad tbh

77% rotten tomatoes

6.9 on IGN http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/07/10/ghostbusters-review-2

[Ad Bot]

[rambo1220]

>IGN

I wonder how much they payed them for this review

[Red Spy]

I wonder how much they payed them for this review

[Valkerone]

Meanwhile on IMDb:


You can literally tell Sony is desperately rigging the critical ratings for this awful movie.

[espio100]

IMDb is stuff imo
Like allot of good movies only have a 6 or so on there

[CRITAWAKETS]

I read the IGN review, its clear that they were payed.

I bet IGN got 100,000 USD

[joe411]

Wait 'till it releases, then watch all of the amateur reviewers rip it a new one.

[Superbro11]

Not to mention they have to have a female review it so the feminist dont bitch. I like how when its a man, the feminist bitch but if its a woman giving a bad score they dont give a stuff at all.

[bestguy22]

this movie is gonna be cliche as forget

[Yosher]

i always trust user reviews more than professional critic reviews

[Juliun03]

IMDb is stuff imo
Like allot of good movies only have a 6 or so on there

but for the ghostbusters movie you can tell those are real ratings

[Ipquarx]

They paid tons of money and they could only get it "alright" reviews. Just goes to show how stuffty the movie's going to be.

[Drydess]

i always trust user reviews more than professional critic reviews

this

[cooolguy32]

i always trust user reviews more than professional critic reviews

I kinda. Both seems like a mixed bag.

[Trymos]

fun fact: critics always say the exact opposite of the audience.