Author Topic: It's a hate crime in the UK to upset women.  (Read 8044 times)

why can't we all chill and appreciate some 🍉

Why are you guys even complaining? So what if a couple seats get taken up and women have more rights than men? Be grateful for the 🍑🍆🍒 at least damn

i'm gay thanks

i'm gay thanks
well your momma still gave birth to you so one way or another your 👅 was in that 🍑 so be grateful for that at least

there's nothing wrong with the idea of criminalizing bigoted harassment, the only problem is that, in practice, you have to somehow make a standard for this and prove that a case fits that standard. as you might guess that's actually pretty impossible; you either over-enforce it or you just accept that you can't win and call it a day. it's the same reason that it'd be hard to actually solve any wage gap nonsense caused by loveism. it's hard to prove and hard to enforce, and that's the biggest issue with things like this. it's just too impractical.

If you claim to respect women you are loveist for giving women special treatment.

If you do not respect women you are loveist for being a misogynist pig.


It's a lose/lose situation except one of those options will turn you into a cuck.

If you claim to respect women you are loveist for giving women special treatment.

If you do not respect women you are loveist for being a misogynist pig.


It's a lose/lose situation except one of those options will turn you into a cuck.
but if you respect both men and women then you arent being loveist you're just being respectful

dont see how thats such a hefty sentence

well your momma still gave birth to you so one way or another your 👅 was in that 🍑 so be grateful for that at least
quite literally a mother forgeter.

I hold the door open for both men and women.

50% of women just stare at me and say they can loving hold it themselves.



I thought it was common courtesy these days. In this case it's a patronizing hate crime.

there's nothing wrong with the idea of criminalizing bigoted harassment, the only problem is that, in practice, you have to somehow make a standard for this and prove that a case fits that standard. as you might guess that's actually pretty impossible; you either over-enforce it or you just accept that you can't win and call it a day. it's the same reason that it'd be hard to actually solve any wage gap nonsense caused by loveism. it's hard to prove and hard to enforce, and that's the biggest issue with things like this. it's just too impractical.

that's why the method i know of is not to """illegalize it""" but rather to regulate it with the power of societal norms

u get harassed? harass back. hm. like the first amendment "you can't be arrested for free speech but other people can still judge you if you're dumb"

I hold the door open for both men and women.

50% of women just stare at me and say they can loving hold it themselves.



I thought it was common courtesy these days.
dude we have no clue which planet you live on but im pretty sure that only happens to you. Every time i hold a door for a boy or girl they both say thank you. seriously though do you live among the amazonians?

If you claim to respect women you are loveist for giving women special treatment.
the only person i can imagine that would think it's loveist to respect women is a loveist who's upset that you're not prejudiced enough for them. the entire point is that respecting hunks and respecting honies are not mutually exclusive. we're all HOEs, humans on earth.

I'm getting really worried for what will come for the next few years if things continue to change like that.

I'm getting really worried for what will come for the next few years if things continue to change like that.
worried that people will learn to refrain from harassing women?

Path just got back on the path.

worried that people will learn to refrain from harassing women?
Not that, but from the fact that there are literaly "feminational socialists" who wants to take woman rights to the extreme.