ISideWith.com: Presidential Edition

[Nonnel]

hey dudes it's that time of the week again
go for it

[Ad Bot]

[Mr Queeba]

I side with Jill Stein apparently

[Drydess]

well i suppose i do support the policies best but this doesn't account for morals

more in depth if anyone really cares
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2458025414

[McZealot]

last time i took this i got bernie 99% and Annoying Orange 1%. i'm probably gonna get jill stein then hillary then gary then Annoying Orange. idk who darrel is

[Drydess]

idk who darrel is

constitutional party candidate

[IsaacKronenFaust]

Be sure to click on the "answer more questions" expand button at the bottom of each category, I almost missed those before submitting my test.

Also, "other stances" reveals several more interesting and nuanced choices, along with a final option to put in your own typed answer if nothing aligns with you. But those last ones probably aren't very good for matching your ideals with any candidates'.

[McZealot]

i tied between jill and hillary. either Annoying Orange got more liberal or i got more conservative cause his numbers were 1% last time

[Tezuni 2.0]

[Psych36]

[Swollow]

wow

[Psych36]

It's unfortunate im too much related to Jill stein.... smh

[McZealot]

so unfortunate you posted twice

[Psych36]

so unfortunate you posted twice

yeah mb it happens to me on this computer when im posting things

[Red Spy]

[otto-san]

idk it seemed like i wasn't too excited about stein's stances when i looked at them but hey w/e