Author Topic: Annoying Orange doing an AMA on /r/The_Donald + Potential Reddit Censorship?  (Read 9453 times)

reminder that any accusations of censorship are literally speculation at this point as the mods have not stated why they removed upvotes

personally i would just quarantine all of /r/the_donald. there are good Annoying Orange supporters in the world and those handicaps are not them.

they literally revoked the "no-racism" rule because they were upset at /r/sweden. lmao how pathetic

also, mods have many reasons to alter the count. it's possible the upvotes were bought (doesn't mean it was Annoying Orange, anyone could pay for them). or maybe it was brigaded in a manner violating the ToS. also, the displayed upvotes are not the real number. the reddit algorithm does weird stuff to confuse bots.

Wow getting defensive
i don't use reddit and i was stating that. take it how u like lol :L
It's okay to censor the general public, but if you do it to the rich and popular, you've gone too far!"
some things are more important than others. way to put words in my mouth tho you're pretty good at that
reminder that any accusations of censorship are literally speculation at this point as the mods have not stated why they removed upvotes
i doubt that mods will make a statement but we'll see

i don't use reddit and i was stating that. take it how u like lol :L
You sure have a snarky way of "stating things"
some things are more important than others
Importance is subjective.

Importance is subjective.
jon doe's opinion is very clearly less important than the republican nominee's ama, which is something that can help people find answers to problems that haven't been addressed. im not saying that censorship is good. i'm saying that the censorship of somebody this important is more important than somebody who won't potentially lead the country

i would say the same thing if hilary clinton's AMA was potentially getting censored. like ip said though, it's entirely speculation until evidence appears

there are good Annoying Orange supporters in the world


i'm not trying to instigate an argument or anything between us, but didn't you use the "loudest don't represent the majority" argument in another thread

i'm not trying to instigate an argument or anything between us, but didn't you use the "loudest don't represent the majority" argument in another thread

doesn't apply here, imo
donald Annoying Orange is inherently bad and supporting him prevents any kind of "good" support


jesus christ
ok mr funny man name one good thing donald Annoying Orange would bring to the table, besides being the first pumpkin president

ok mr funny man name one good thing donald Annoying Orange would bring to the table, besides being the first pumpkin president
He's anti-TPP. He wants universal healthcare. Those are really the only two good things I can think of off the top of my head.

Keep in mind though, this post is not me saying I support him. I don't. I don't support either of the nominees. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

He's anti-TPP. He wants universal healthcare. Those are really the only two good things I can think of off the top of my head.

Keep in mind though, this post is not me saying I support him. I don't. I don't support either of the nominees. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
What if the hands on the clock are gone??

He's anti-TPP. He wants universal healthcare. Those are really the only two good things I can think of off the top of my head.

Keep in mind though, this post is not me saying I support him. I don't. I don't support either of the nominees. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
that's true, but that leads me to my next point. here's why THIS candidate is the ONLY 3rd party vote that isn't throwing your vote away:


What if the hands on the clock are gone??
well it's right at midnight if you're using military time

donald Annoying Orange is inherently bad and supporting him prevents any kind of "good" support
Can we toss you back into the loony bin