Author Topic: [HABBENING] George Soros Internal Files leaked, 2,576 files [1.51GB] disclosed.  (Read 2283 times)

http://soros.dcleaks.com/

Quote
DC Leaks announced a new leak called “SOROS INTERNAL FILES – BIG DATA“. The leak was published on August 13th and announced via their social media accounts including Facebook and Twitter.
Just as the leak is labeled, the data appears to be from Soros internal systems. The data published on the DC Leaks website as a sub domain was quickly brown townyzed by our RBS researchers.
We can confirm that there are a total 2,576 files totaling 1.51GB in total which includes the following file types:
1,413 PDF, 550 Docx, 225 Doc, 98 XLSX, 37 XLS, 20 PPT
The Soros subdomain is also broken down by the following sections:
USA – 967 files, 559MB / Europe – 651 files, 425MB / Eurasia – 224 files, 86.9MB / Asia – 26 files, 26.0 MB / Latin America – 84 files, 7.57 MB / Africa – 85 files, 38.1mb / World Bank – 42 files, 219 MB / President’s Office – 365 files, 114MB / SOUK – 81 files, 42.4 MB
The data itself contains a vast range of internal documents which includes scans and copies of funding reports, funding agreements, contracts and other similar internal documents. There are also image files and rich text files as well.



if you're looking through this, there are many files that look as though there are reports, media summaries, etc. but i've heard there are seas interesting files/pdf documents, much like hillary's e-mail leak. as of now, i haven't been able to find much news about this, probably because of how recent it's been. if i find more information, i'll edit this post and add in a larger summary

what do you guys think of this? do you think there's a connection between this and the recent activity of leakers such as snowden or wikileaks & co.?

also somewhat unrelated but still interesting;
« Last Edit: August 13, 2016, 08:08:38 PM by Decepticon »

lovin all the big leaks like this as of recently

The paragraph on that page is some r/the_donald or some other conspiracy grade bullstuff.

It will be interesting to see the role of money in politics here if anyone actually picks it up


Quote
George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named as the architect and sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. Thanks to him and his puppets USA is thought to be a vampire, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His slaves spill blood of millions and millions people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone take a look at restricted documents of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. It represents workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.
[citation needed]

The paragraph on that page is some r/the_donald or some other conspiracy grade bullstuff.

It will be interesting to see the role of money in politics here if anyone actually picks it up
[citation needed]
i removed that bit, i read it halfway myself initially and thought it was just a summary of who george soros & it sounded more loony than i thought it was. it was at least half-sensible, soros is politically active & a very rich man, and there's no doubt he's very shady when it comes to it

that shouldn't throw away or lower the reputability of the leaks, though
« Last Edit: August 13, 2016, 08:16:17 PM by Decepticon »

A lot of these leaks seem to be super hyped up when there is very little if anything that is actually noteworthy in them.  Do they have any highlights about anything interesting or did they just go the very irresponsibile route and dump everything?

that shouldn't throw away or lower the reputability of the leaks, though

I dunno it's pretty reasonable to become a bit skeptical of some anonymous source when they start spouting off nutjob lines.  I mean it's not as bad as the use of (((echoes))) by the official Wikileaks twitter but it's still a somewhat reliable indicator to be weary of them.

A lot of these leaks seem to be super hyped up when there is very little if anything that is actually noteworthy in them.  Do they have any highlights about anything interesting or did they just go the very irresponsibile route and dump everything?
I dunno it's pretty reasonable to become a bit skeptical of some anonymous source when they start spouting off nutjob lines.  I mean it's not as bad as the use of (((echoes))) by the official Wikileaks twitter but it's still a somewhat reliable indicator to be weary of them.

(((devildogelite))) confirmed for government shill

i removed that bit, i read it halfway myself initially and thought it was just a summary of who george soros & it sounded more loony than i thought it was. it was at least half-sensible, soros is politically active & a very rich man, and there's no doubt he's very shady when it comes to it

that shouldn't throw away or lower the reputability of the leaks, though

The leaks are primary sources.

I remember Chomsky explaining that the US as a superpower tries to organized the world for its own ends, but I don't think all of that can be blamed on Soros, while it can be blamed on US foreign policy/politics.

The reason I called that bit "the_Donald grade bullstuff" is because I tried to look for the leaks on Reddit but all that came up were the conspiracy echoes coming from the r/the_donald echo chambers.