Poll

What was the worst natural disaster?

Bangladesh Cyclone
0 (0%)
1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake
0 (0%)
The Black Plague
9 (15%)
Great Kanto Earthquake
0 (0%)
2010 Haiti Earthquake
0 (0%)
The Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event (End of the Dinosaurs)
21 (35%)
Typhoon Nina
0 (0%)
2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake & Tsunami
0 (0%)
Antioch Earthquake
0 (0%)
Antioch Earthquake #2
0 (0%)
The September 11th Attacks
3 (5%)
The Paris Attacks
1 (1.7%)
Nuclear bombings of Hiroshima & Nagasaki
3 (5%)
Calcutta Cyclone
0 (0%)
Shaanxi Earthquake
0 (0%)
2011 Joplin Tornado
0 (0%)
2011 Japan Earthquake & Tsunami
1 (1.7%)
Mt. Saint Helens Eruption
0 (0%)
The Yellow River Flood
0 (0%)
The Great Floods in China
3 (5%)
Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius
0 (0%)
Chilean Earthquake (9.5 Magnitude)
0 (0%)
Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster
5 (8.3%)
The Holocaust
8 (13.3%)
Hurricane Katrina
1 (1.7%)
Mao Zedong goes mad and creates a Massacre
0 (0%)
World War II
4 (6.7%)
The Smallpox Plague
0 (0%)
The Great Dying (Look it up, it's worse than K-T)
1 (1.7%)

Total Members Voted: 60

Author Topic: What was the most destructive disaster in history? (POLL)  (Read 4487 times)

when harambe became a meme

The meteor that killed 90% of life on our planet.

There is no competition, that literally is the most destructive disaster in our history.
Only if we measure destruction by loss of life.

The formation of the moon from the supposed collision of Earth and Theia would be significantly more destructive.

millions of Chinese dying of starvation under Mao
« Last Edit: August 18, 2016, 04:00:44 PM by Akio- »

The formation of the moon from the supposed collision of Earth and Theia would be significantly more destructive.
Maybe Theia wanted to get it on with Earth and gave birth to the moon.
Super Cringy I'm sorry.

i mean from a technical standpoint, dinosaurs.
the worst part is they got replaced with stuffty humans

i mean from a technical standpoint, dinosaurs.
the worst part is they got replaced with stuffty humans

what's with this stuffty ideology i keep seeing that humans aren't valuable

what's with this stuffty ideology i keep seeing that humans aren't valuable
T-Rex

humans (stuff)


the superior choice here is clear

dinosaurs existed for like 1000x as long as humans and they never developed language or instant ramen so they're substantially worse than humans

dinosaurs existed for like 1000x as long as humans and they never developed language or instant ramen so they're substantially worse than humans
they lived simple and humble lives and that's truly something to aspire for. like life is cool or whatever but let's not make a whole operation out of it. dont need all these extravagances like "laws" or "my richardhead neighbor who still says he "cant find" my hedge trimmers even though his bushes have a sharper edge than a 13 year old on ifunny." ridiculous, is what it is.

T-Rex

humans (stuff)


the superior choice here is clear
Lol Annoying Orangep is so like Riddler and evil xD

Can confirm dinos > hoomans

Lol Annoying Orangep is so like Riddler and evil xD
all he does is perpetuate other ppls opinions so its as expected tbh

dinosaurs existed for like 1000x as long as humans and they never developed language or instant ramen so they're substantially worse than humans
On the other hand, they lived 1000x as long as humans without developing instant ramen, so they're substantially better than humans.

dinosaurs can't make fry sauce because they got small-ass hands

checkmate

humans: 1

dinosaurs: 0

The formation of the moon from the supposed collision of Earth and Theia would be significantly more destructive.

negating destructive facts with beneficial facts is a slippery slope