he said gender not love tristan
he brought up biology, i'm going to answer in biology
if he considers them the same thing, then my answer was exactly what he was talking about
if he doesn't, then biology (and thus his inital comment) isn't relevant anyway because gender is a social construct
also having a different number of x/y chromosomes doesn't make you an entirely different love from the normal male/female
i would say that it does
or if not, does naturally having ambiguous or nonexistent genitals qualify? because that happens too
if that doesn't qualify, then how do you even define love in the first place