at how many frames per second does the universe work

[}]Crazy[{]

so how many fps does the universe work at
we cant see past 100 fps right
so does that mean the universe only works at 100 fps or am i insane

[Ad Bot]

[Daswiruch]

reality can't be measured in frames

we cant see past 100 fps right

also what the forget does "see past" mean do you think you can see through a monitor if it's going 99 frames or less or when it hits 101 everything goes black

[espio100]

we cant see past 100 fps right

Are you daft
There are poeple who can see the difference between 120 and 144FPS

Also

reality can't be measured in frames

[Meta_KnightX]

Reality really has infinite frames, honestly. A slow-mo camera captures so many frames in one second, and it will just get more and more frames per second on those cameras

[Freek]

probably more than 15
maybe 10 on the weekends

[Space1255]

All of them.

[The Resonte!]

depends on the current computing load

[ReddBoi]

maybe 10 on the weekends

[Rally]

Could we assume that the 'tick rate' of the universe is equal to the time it takes light to travel one planck length?

I'll wager 18550000000000000000000000000 000000000000000hz

[Drydess]

70 on a good day, you know how unreliable comcast is though

[}]Crazy[{]

also what the forget does "see past" mean do you think you can see through a monitor if it's going 99 frames or less or when it hits 101 everything goes black

i obviously meant see past as in unable to notice the difference pastttt

[Rally]

I think that, on average, the average human can detect change in FPS up to 150fps. I think 240fps is considered the limit. I don't want to make any official statements because I know people get mad as forget about this stuff for no reason at all.

[Juncoph]

so how many fps does the universe work at
we cant see past 100 fps right
so does that mean the universe only works at 100 fps or am i insane

that's not how spacetime works at all

[Foxscotch]

Could we assume that the 'tick rate' of the universe is equal to the time it takes light to travel one planck length?

probably not

[espio100]

No wait im daft