Author Topic: Hillary uses speakers in her ears to get told what to say.  (Read 9534 times)

So you're saying the potential president of the United States that is caked up in make up has greasy ears?

So you're saying the potential president of the United States that is caked up in make up has greasy ears?
What are you even trying to argue anymore?
Makeup can be reflective too.

And that's assuming she caked the insides of her ears with it. I might be wrong because I'm not familiar with makeup, but I don't believe that's a common practice.

You're also all still missing the main idea of the argument: why is the alleged transmitter mysteriously gone when the photo is taken from a different angle, even when the angle is more revealing of the ear?

What are you even trying to argue anymore?
Makeup can be reflective too.

And that's assuming she caked the insides of her ears with it. I might be wrong because I'm not familiar with makeup, but I don't believe that's a common practice.

You're also all still missing the main idea of the argument: why is the alleged transmitter mysteriously gone when the photo is taken from a different angle, even when the angle is more revealing of the ear?
if you didnt notice tony still claims its there even in the more revealing photos

i realize that this post out of context is probably hilarious

i realize that this post out of context is probably hilarious
Yeah that's why I specified "more revealing of the ear"

why is the alleged transmitter mysteriously gone when the photo is taken from a different angle, even when the angle is more revealing of the ear?

Because it can only be seen in specific angles, haven't you seen covert transmitters?

They can only be seen over head angles which are harder to spot.

Because it can only be seen in specific angles, haven't you seen covert transmitters?

They can only be seen over head angles which are harder to spot.
That would discredit your pictures then???

Because it can only be seen in specific angles, haven't you seen covert transmitters?
The picture I linked shows the side of her face, with her ear straight on. You literally can not get a clearer angle.

They can only be seen over head angles which are harder to spot.
Your photo "proof" isn't overhead, so this claim is completely irrelevant
« Last Edit: September 28, 2016, 03:07:07 PM by Headcrab Zombie »

So you're saying the potential president of the United States that is caked up in make up has greasy ears?
are we going to argue that we can't have someone with greasy ears as our president now

there's no issue here unless they're airpods or beats, then we're having serious problems

there's no issue here unless they're airpods or beats, then we're having serious problems

Only a rich socialite like Hillary would pay more than $150 for headphones.

Only a rich socialite like Hillary would pay more than $150 for headphones.
I thought the stereotype was that right wingers are rich

Oh the little white thing in the ear (wich suprisingly, is the ear)
I tought the huge gold earring or something lmao

Yh tony is being a twat again

I thought the stereotype was that right wingers are rich

politicians are rich lmao

mrw like 5 people buy into tony's clickbait conspiracy theories