Author Topic: Hillary Clinton on Julian Assange - "Why don't we just drone strike this guy?"  (Read 10732 times)

http://truepundit.com/under-intense-pressure-to-silence-wikileaks-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-proposed-drone-strike-on-julian-assange/

heartless hillary once again shows her lack of morals

for the stupid: she is proposing the US drone strike where julian assange is currently living (london)
« Last Edit: October 04, 2016, 12:08:15 AM by c »


i want a president who would kill innocents for censorship like Hillary

Let's kill a citizen of an allied nation while they live in the capital of another allied nation in the one way that will produce as much collateral damage as we can.

loving genius, Hillary. That's the best idea I've ever heard (it isn't)

hillary wtf

How could she even think that would be a ok thing to say



oh, by drone strike at first I was thinking of something like an amazon drone that would smack them over the head
then I thought of amazon blow job drones

then once I got to the last comments I figured out it meant a UAV as the drone, with explosives..


so you do guys even read the garbage you post or do you just pat yourself on the back because the headline condemned the evil drone woman
http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/

Quote
Origin:On 2 October 2016, the web site True Pundit published an article reporting that Hillary Clinton had supposedly attempted to order a drone strike on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in order to "silence" that organization's efforts:

The claim might not have seemed so incredible to some readers, as Assange himself had previously voiced the possibility of his being assassinated by drone, although even in his imaginings the chances of such an action (initiated by the CIA, not by Hillary Clinton) were not likely:

First of all, the only cited source documenting that Hillary Clinton had ever suggested (even in jest) that a drone strike could take out Julian Assange was "sources at the State Department," a vague and anonymous reference that does not yield to verification. Second, the claim that Hillary Clinton or her aides had either hinted or directly ordered remote assassination of Assange in November 2010 focused on a questionable interpretation of the terms "legal and nonlegal strategies" that appeared in the subject line of e-mails sent by Anne-Marie Slaughter, Director of Policy Planning at the U.S. Department of State and released via WikiLeaks' first searchable Hillary Clinton e-mail archive in March 2016.

i cant believe anyone here is stupid enough to believe a former secretary of state and first lady would genuinely propose a drone strike on london...

rip that what happens when i browse at 12:30am

i cant believe anyone here is stupid enough to believe a former secretary of state and first lady would genuinely propose a drone strike on london...
I can't believe that anyone here in the US is loving stupid enough to just roll over and settle with these "options" this election.

I can't believe that anyone here in the US is loving stupid enough to just roll over and settle with these "options" this election.
i mean, that's a completely different subject, but i'm not really sure if its even fair to say we are 'settling'. i dont think anyone is very happy with these candidates. really the best people can do is justify one to themselves via a better of two evils argument.

and i dont know what you expect people who dont like it to do. half the population to decide on gary johnson? because its not exactly like we have much of a choice here...

its a whole lot easier to give up during a crappy situation than it is to stick through it and come to the least terrible outcome.

Most people are voting because the candidate they wanted dropped out, so now they have to settle with a bowl of stuff