so im not gonna read all the emails but is there anything actually bad in here? if not wikileaks is damaging their own reputation by deliberating harming governments who haven't done wrong.
They basically state that, despite the fact the Clinton Foundation claims to have nothing to do with the sale of Uranium One to the Russians and says any accusations thereof are "baseless", she's received millions of dollars in donations (which were NOT publicly identified as per her agreement with the Obama Administration) from individuals with ties to the "new" Uranium One, all while the donors are endorsing her campaign in her emails.
So, she helped sell 1/5 of our uranium production capacity to the russians and secretly took millions of dollars of donations from them and got their endorsement.
so yeah, that's pretty bad, but shillaries will say it's no big deal or fake
WikiLeaks has pretty much lost it's credibility, I wouldn't be surprised if some of these were fake.
exhibit a, this person even claimed wikileaks isn't credible lmfao
