Author Topic: Happy World Patriarchy Day!  (Read 3303 times)

B.I.G.'s post was off topic. "Why would you come back just so you could act stupid again?"
OH! That makes sense, Whoops!

Let me respond with that in mind.

B.I.G.
Your Self fulfilling prophecy mindset has lead you to search through my posts and flip stuff at the single scent of something going 'wrong'.
I had a Feeling it would end up this way when you sent me those PM's, and acted that way to me in that one thread where you basically
flipped out at me, over a request for you to explain something you made vague. (I know, Pot calling the kettle black, but I don't even remember
what thread that was in.)

still missing the point
If you could Point out how I was 'handicapped', with further explanation that would be fantastic.
Oh I don't hate the country, but I'm not going to ignore what it is.
Oh, Well that just tore my point to shambles.

Okay, I'm handicapped because I made a thread about a Holiday that makes fun of people who scream bullstuff?
Or am I missing something?
Well you're celebrating a handicapped joke holiday so already something's wrong with you

Liberals are right when they say the people who mock them are more annoying than them themselves

Liberals are right when they say the people who mock them are more annoying than them themselves
damn rightists

Well you're celebrating a handicapped joke holiday so already something's wrong with you

You may have actually had a solid point, If I wasn't actually 17.
Huh, that's an unfortunate misreading on my part. I don't have any advice for you then.

Also, aside from the white part, wtf is wrong with being nationalist?
There's nothing inherently wrong with patriotism or loyalty to one's country, but among people who self-identify as 'nationalist', there's usually overlap with a bunch of other crazy bullstuff. Take a random sample of political movements with 'nationalism' in their name, and you'll find lots of neo-national socialists, white supremacists, and similar crazy people.

Nationalism as a political attitude has some problems as well. It's pretty much unanimously agreed upon among economists that free, global trade is ultimately beneficial for everyone who participates in it, which is sort of opposite to the nationalist mantra of 'putting one's country first' (usually through sanctions and barriers on trade). Also, anti-immigration sentiment isn't always rooted in reality. Every major period of immigration in world history has had some sort of nationalist push-back, usually involving fears over lost jobs, crime, and 'destruction of culture'. What ends up happening is that immigration waves are followed by periods of strong economic growth, without any corresponding increase in crime rates that can't be explained by normal population growth. And whatever cultures were there at the start usually persist, sometimes mixing with the cultures of immigrants, but never creating anything inherently worse than what already existed.



Nationalism as a political attitude has some problems as well. It's pretty much unanimously agreed upon among economists that free, #1global trade is ultimately beneficial for everyone who participates in it, which is sort of opposite to the nationalist mantra of 'putting one's country first' (usually through sanctions and barriers on trade). Also, #2anti-immigration sentiment isn't always rooted in reality. Every major period of immigration in world history has had some sort of nationalist push-back, usually involving fears over lost jobs, crime, and #3'destruction of culture'. What ends up happening is that immigration waves are followed by periods of strong economic growth, without any corresponding increase in crime rates that can't be explained by normal population growth. And whatever cultures were there at the start usually persist, sometimes mixing with the cultures of immigrants, but never creating anything inherently worse than what already existed.

Alright, Explaining time.
#1global trade is ultimately beneficial for everyone who participates in it,
Global Trade may work out fine, if the laws were set aside from other laws, but what has happened is that by allowing Global Trade in practice (as seen in the EU)
is that you allow Global Migration, and Whilst Migration in it of itself isn't a bad thing, it is when you consider what I have to say in points 2 and 3.
#2anti-immigration sentiment
Milo isn't full Anti-Immigration, because some people do want to come to other countries with the intent of adapting to the civilization they are going to as well as
bringing their own culture to mix, but unfortunately with common Muslim culture, the idea is to force your ideas upon others. (no, not terrorists, but standard Average Muslims.)
Sharia Law has set people out with mindsets like this, and they just haven't adjusted to the rest of the world.
#3'destruction of culture'
Only Culture that forces its own culture upon others will destroy another culture.

just accept the fact that this is a stuffpost, you're making yourself look like an autist

Only Culture that forces its own culture upon others will destroy another culture.

Literally every culture is as destructive as the muslim culture. Just because there's one video of people who say they follow sharia law doesn't mean every muslim is hell-bent on seeing western culture fall. They're fleeing from death, committed both by the US and CIA. If they wanted to practice their own radical beliefs they would be allied with terrorist groups, not fleeing with their children from the endless drone strikes that probably killed the rest of their family.

Only Culture that forces its own culture upon others will destroy another culture.
remember the native americans?
the ones whos' cultures were forgeted in the ass by europeans?

remember the native americans?
the ones whos' cultures were forgeted in the ass by europeans?
dude remember the crusades, the hundred or so years when christian knights reclaimed the body parts of innocent muslims on the walls of their homes?

Also just want to point out that the entire notion of this holiday is "lets create a global holiday that celebrates the quote on quote oppression of women. After all, a small minority of radical feminists hate men so obviously the majority of men should celebrate being douches!"

What's next, national "all muslims are terrorists" day?
« Last Edit: October 18, 2016, 03:15:23 PM by Perry »

Global Trade may work out fine, if the laws were set aside from other laws, but what has happened is that by allowing Global Trade in practice (as seen in the EU)
is that you allow Global Migration, and Whilst Migration in it of itself isn't a bad thing, it is when you consider what I have to say in points 2 and 3.
I actually don't understand the point you're making here. Global trade and global migration do not have to occur simultaneously. We engage in extensive trade with China, but there is no special policy where, because they're our trading partners, they get to send over X amount of immigrants per year. Trade and immigration are two completely separate things.

Milo isn't full Anti-Immigration, because some people do want to come to other countries with the intent of adapting to the civilization they are going to as well as
bringing their own culture to mix, but unfortunately with common Muslim culture, the idea is to force your ideas upon others. (no, not terrorists, but standard Average Muslims.)
The central dogma of our nation's origin is that we wanted a place where people could come and embrace their own culture, language, and religion without persecution by tyrants. As far as I know, this hasn't changed, and it has never been an American policy to deny people the right to live here just because they do not want to sacrifice all of their ancestral culture.

It's funny that you cite Muslims as being some sort of invasive disease on culture, because the sole responsibility of Christians as servants of God is to spread the word about Jesus and convert as many people as possible (often forcefully, and against the will of native peoples) in order to spare them from damnation. However, despite the fact that we are a predominantly Christian nation, our laws haven't been written with the goal of converting people to Christianity. Why do you believe that Muslim immigrants are going to be able to completely rewrite our nation's laws, despite comprising an extremely small minority of our population?

Only Culture that forces its own culture upon others will destroy another culture.
Except this literally never happens in the context of legal immigration. Cultures mix and mingle when people live next to each other, but it's never some sort of oppressive force. Immigration isn't a slippery slope where you let a few Muslims into your town, and before you know it, all your kids are wearing Taqiyahs and fasting for Ramadan. The only reason miscegenation happens is because people consent to it, in which case, who loving cares?