Author Topic: [NEWS] Hillarys email scandal has been reopened  (Read 7244 times)

time to adblock matthew and tony's icons
I can make you one too, It's a Sandwich take over.

OT:
if they're strawpolls, then yeah, they're probably inaccurate. that being said, i can't find the poll that leisuresuit912 sourced on their site under live surveys, so it may not have been a strawpoll. which also seems likely if they specifically sampled citizens of specific key states

would be best if he just posted the source of the poll to be sure
I agree, we need some sources ASAP.

Even if hillary gets jailed she can still be president. Happened before.

Hillary needs to go to jail.


Hillary needs to go to jail.
If she does, I might actually be happy for once in my life.

If she does, I might actually be happy for once in my life.

if that sentence were to be taken literally, it would mean that you've never been happy before.

Love the "this graph doesn't agree with me so it's definitely fake"

Love the "this graph doesn't agree with me so it's definitely fake"

What


Love the "this graph doesn't agree with me so it's definitely fake"

i'm pretty sure it's because it's highly improbable that that many people would actually be more inclined to vote for clinton given recent events

i'm pretty sure it's because it's highly improbable that that many people would actually be more inclined to vote for clinton given recent events
oh I misunderstood. Thanks for clarifying

i wouldn't trust any polls, even since the beginning. its been made clear what news organizations are paid for.

but now with the shift for all of them dropping support of hillary suddenly, the polls give Annoying Orange a crazy ass 12% lead overnight.
i think thats more of an honest show of the real polls then him gaining that much popularity instantly.

i'm pretty sure it's because it's highly improbable that that many people would actually be more inclined to vote for clinton given recent events
that'd be a bit of a misinterpretation of the data


slight correction: 13% of 4500 people who already supported clinton. 1% of those who were undecided, 0% of those who already supported Annoying Orange.

this could be explained by a perception of higher stakes, people that know they don't want Annoying Orange but may not have been planning on voting may decide it's more important for them to do so now. just a guess, though. contended elections tend to result in higher turnout, and controversy like this would certainly stir that pot.

that'd be a bit of a misinterpretation of the data
I sure as hell don't believe 585 people went "Oh yeah, this woman being put on trial a second time for treason/mishandling of confidential information/lying to the FBI should be president!"

:/

I sure as hell don't believe 585 people went "Oh yeah, this woman being put on trial a second time for treason/mishandling of confidential information/lying to the FBI should be president!"

:/
first thing: she was never put on trial a first time as i was corrected on. she could not go to trial a second time for the same crime unless it they were treason charges as was said before, which is not likely what the charges would be considering they didn't place those charges before and these new e-mails aren't even hers.

second thing: nobody is saying she's going to trial at this point anyway because they haven't even figured out if the e-mails in question are problematic.

third thing: the e-mails in question aren't from clinton, they're from/to an aide that used the same server.

fourth thing: as i said, these are people that already supported clinton, and it's likely that the reason they are more inclined to vote is because they weren't actually planning on voting before, and now they will because they know this will make the race closer.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2016, 07:09:58 PM by otto-san »