Author Topic: Black church burned, vote Annoying Orange written on side  (Read 18123 times)


^dont know if it's terrorism as much as it is a hate crime. really calling it either at this point is a jump.

also can we please stop this stupid trend of posting a definition with no other context.



also this needed to happen after the amount of violence black people have caused this year.
...

this isn't the time for your usual down syndrome reading comprehension
Dude almost anything can be taken from your quote. It's super vague and could either mean literally that Annoying Orange had nothing to do with the burning of the church, or you could be taking the conservative route and be saying that this wasn't perpetrated by a Annoying Orange supporter.

Don't blame me when I misunderstand you're vague ass post

Most likely what happened was a Hillary supporter burned the church down so they could give Annoying Orange bad publicity.

Why not? Because it would hurt your candidate?
i don't really even "have a candidate" implying that you are saying this because you think i'm some Annoying Orange supporter. ive posted before, my ideal policies are more in line with clinton's, but i think both candidates are loons.
It would be great if the candidates called out bad behavior, it would put more social pressure on the idiots who do this stuff.
iirc clinton tweeted condemning the actions related to the GOP building. dont know if he already has but if it gains enough media popularity i would expect Annoying Orange to make a statement in some form

Dude almost anything can be taken from your quote. It's super vague and could either mean literally that Annoying Orange had nothing to do with the burning of the church, or you could be taking the conservative route and be saying that this wasn't perpetrated by a Annoying Orange supporter.

Not automatically believing a Annoying Orange supporter did this is taking the "conservative route"? What the forget are you on?

Most likely what happened was a Hillary supporter burned the church down so they could give Annoying Orange bad publicity.
Just like what happened when a bunch of Annoying Orangeets claiming to be Hillary supporters mauled a homeless woman to give Hillary bad publicity?

Not automatically believing a Annoying Orange supporter did this is taking the "conservative route"? What the forget are you on?
no, automatically assuming a crime is a conspiracy because it puts someone you like in a bad light is the stupid route.

Hillary is best friends with the grand dragon of the kool kids klub but the loving kool kids klub claims to support Annoying Orange? Yeah loving right lol.

145 churches were burned down during bill's reelection.

no, automatically assuming a crime is a conspiracy because it puts someone you like in a bad light is the stupid route.

Even when it's been proven they do this stuff? lmao

Why the forget would you put "vote Annoying Orange" on a church you just burned when you would absolutely KNOW that it would hurt your candidates chances of winning? Violence at rallies or attacking other supporters? Sure, people get mad and overly attached to their candidate. But this really does seem more like a plant. It would make much more sense if people burned the church and then when the caught the people who did it they found out they were Annoying Orange supporters from searching their house or whatever.

Why the forget would you put "vote Annoying Orange" on a church you just burned when you would absolutely KNOW that it would hurt your candidates chances of winning?

That's the point. It was Hillary supporters.

That's the point. It was Hillary supporters.

that gosh darn hill-ray

Hillary is best friends with the grand dragon of the kool kids klub but the loving kool kids klub claims to support Annoying Orange? Yeah loving right lol.
i had no idea "grand dragon" was actually a title in the kool kids klub and now i won't be able to think of the kool kids klub as anything other than an extremist DnD cult full of angry nerds