Author Topic: Black church burned, vote Annoying Orange written on side  (Read 18155 times)

that isn't a black church, looks pretty beige to me, as long as its not 1955 there is no such thing as a black church, since when were we segregating our churches?
Democrats always have to make race an issue when it isn't one. Also with the amount of bullstuff in wikileaks im 95% sure Hillary paid some fat stacks to the arsonists to do it, her campaign has already been caught doing crazy stuff like starting fights, just go watch the project veritas videos.
Hillary's campaign is falling apart amid this new email investigation and its clear she'll do anything to get elected
what Annoying Orange supporter in their right mind would think this would help Annoying Orange
If it isn't Hillary's doings its a Hillary supporter "Vote Annoying Orange" on the side of a burned building could also mean "go ahead and vote Annoying Orange and see what happens next"
« Last Edit: November 03, 2016, 01:29:10 AM by warble »

that isn't a black church, looks pretty beige to me, as long as its not 1955 there is no such thing as a black church, since when were we segregating our churches?
Democrats always have to make race an issue when it isn't one.
de facto segregation is separate from de jure segregation, if people voluntarily/coincidentally split themselves by race there's nothing illegal about that, which is what happens with churches and schools that are still all/majorly full of only one race

that isn't a black church, looks pretty beige to me, as long as its not 1955 there is no such thing as a black church, since when were we segregating our churches?
as someone who lives in a state with a church on every corner. pretty much every small church is voluntarily split by race. black and white people preach very very differently

now you can most definitely go to a black church. you might not like it though. they probably won't either because they don't want another Charleston to happen again
« Last Edit: November 03, 2016, 01:33:17 AM by Trogtor »


I understand this, but Cnn wouldn't have a story if they weren't pandering to this low down idea that all republicans are tribal. Without the word black in the title no one would be talking about this, and that is what is wrong with our media today

I understand this, but Cnn wouldn't have a story if they weren't pandering to this low down idea that all republicans are tribal. Without the word black in the title no one would be talking about this, and that is what is wrong with our media today
uh
they'd still have a story because someone burnt down a church and wrote "vote Annoying Orange" on it

that alone is really contradicting but since it's black it kinda make sense why they did it

so the fact it's a black church is a big reason why it happened

that alone is really contradicting but since it's black it kinda make sense why they did it

so the fact it's a black church is a big reason why it happened
ITS BECAUSE DRUMPF IS A tribal ......... -__-


are you implying that blacks in general dont support Annoying Orange? cause that would be some proof of his racism, if anything.

either way the whole thing is stupid - this is why we need less polarizing/more moderate (and well spoken) candidates in elections, rather than extremes. people would be less likely or less provoked to do things to try to defame one or the other, and even if such actions are taken, it's not suggested to be directly associated with the candidate by non-conspiracy theorists.

are you implying that blacks in general dont support Annoying Orange? cause that would be some proof of his racism, if anything.

either way the whole thing is stupid - this is why we need less polarizing/more moderate (and well spoken) candidates in elections, rather than extremes. people would be less likely or less provoked to do things to try to defame one or the other, and even if such actions are taken, it's not suggested to be directly associated with the candidate by non-conspiracy theorists.

If you took 5 minutes to read the damn article/watch the video,
you would see he also posted kool kids klub-like signs around the church against black people.

Aka, Setting himself up for a victim card.

This seems very similar to the church getting burned down, its too straight forward a message.


Im hillary clinton and i paid people to burn this church

i remember a rabbi spray painted a swastika on a jew church around here, wouldn't be surprised if shillary/soros drones did the same to this church

i remember a rabbi spray painted a swastika on a jew church around here, wouldn't be surprised if shillary/soros drones did the same to this church

you're delusional. clearly there are enough tribal Annoying Orange supporters for this to be probable