Author Topic: Black church burned, vote Annoying Orange written on side  (Read 18047 times)

Don't get me wrong, clinton lies. Obama lied too. but so did Annoying Orange. oh and almost every single president in existence.

Clinton is as much a liar as Annoying Orange, so if you want to come thru on why one is more lie than the other, go ahead.


may i remind all of you proud, supposedly eligible to even vote americans that this is coming form a guy who got brown townLY ANNIHILATED  in his milo yianappieloze thread, started supporting hillary and then flip-flopped to a state that even i find pitiful

what proof do you have that says they're biased? also if fox news says the factcheckers are wrong that's not really proving it as much as just stating it for the sake of your political opinions.

"huurrr u disagree wit me derefore u watch faux newz!!!111"
God you're a parasite
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation
There is an entire site brown townyzing their bias http://www.politifactbias.com/
http://i.imgur.com/Y9j7AKp.png

but it doesn't change the fact that blaming this church burning on liberals is tribal as forget.

Wait how is that tribal? I would understand if people were blaming the church burning on Arabs or Whites, but how is it tribal to blame it on Liberals or Conservatives? A political affiliation isn't a race.

what happened to path being a "conservative sjw" lmao

Wait how is that tribal? I would understand if people were blaming the church burning on Arabs or Whites, but how is it tribal to blame it on Liberals or Conservatives? A political affiliation isn't a race.
It's tribal to pretend like racism doesn't exist and turn an obviously racially-motivated terrorist attack into a 'liberal conspiracy'.

It's tribal to pretend like racism doesn't exist and turn an obviously racially-motivated terrorist attack into a 'liberal conspiracy'.

clinton's campaign conspires, so it's not an unreasonable line of thought

it was either that, or a racially motivated attack using Annoying Orange to piss off the churchgoers, but i really don't believe a genuine Annoying Orange supporter would think this would help him.

his supporters did raise over $120k to help rebuild the church tho
« Last Edit: November 03, 2016, 05:29:47 PM by Frequency »

It's tribal to pretend like racism doesn't exist and turn an obviously racially-motivated terrorist attack into a 'liberal conspiracy'.

No one is pretending that racism doesn't exist. I would know because I set Serbians on fire every night People are just finding it odd that a supposed Annoying Orange supporter would burn down a church and THEN wrote "vote Annoying Orange" on the side even though he would obviously know that would hurt his favorite candidates chances. It it make more sense if he burned down the church, got caught, and then it was found out that he was a massive Annoying Orange supporter. It looks like this person was trying to make it as obvious as possible that Annoying Orange supporters did a bad thing to hurt his numbers.

But who knows maybe a different person wrote "vote Annoying Orange" on the side after it burnt down and the person who did it originally wasn't politically affiliated in the first place.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2016, 05:33:13 PM by beachbum111111 »

i really don't believe a genuine Annoying Orange supporter would think this would help him
People are just finding it odd that a supposed Annoying Orange supporter would burn down a church and THEN wrote "vote Annoying Orange" on the side even though he would obviously know that would hurt his favorite candidates chances.
"Finding it odd" and blaming it on Hillary are two completely different things. Yes, it is contradictory to write 'vote Annoying Orange' at the scene of a horrendous crime, but you're ascribing rational thought to a person (or more than likely, a group of people) that did this in a fit of anger.

clinton's campaign conspires, so it's not an unreasonable line of thought
Either way, there is no evidence that Hillary ordered this, or that the arsonists are affiliated with her in any way. Likewise, there is no substantial evidence that the arsonist is affiliated with Annoying Orange in any way. Doubting that is alright, but turning this from a tribal torching into a political conspiracy is completely inappropriate.

I live in Mississippi and I saw a billboard that had a huge vote Annoying Orange and a big red x mark on Hillary's face.
Which also I couldn't see it all but had some words that might have been exposing the fraud/rig

Not surprised

What is the motive to burn down a black church and spray paint "vote Annoying Orange" on the side?

To incite a race riot with BLM and Annoying Orange.

That's the only logical motive.

The whole motive behind "hur I'm gonna support my fav candidate by burning down a church" doesn't loving add up.

The whole motive behind "hur I'm gonna support my fav candidate by burning down a church" doesn't loving add up.
you're ascribing rational thought to a person (or more than likely, a group of people) that did this in a fit of anger.

I live in Mississippi
my condolences

Also notice how the kool kids klub only started supporting Annoying Orange a week before election day.

This whole thing is a loving shake down by clinton.

By completely disreguarding the argument, you show that you are insecure and incapable of having social construct and that you would rather cause crime and damage to those around you.
sorry doctor, where did you get your degree in armchair psychology again? you sure gathered a lot from that post.