Author Topic: Lol ok Nickpb, you need to find other original ways to dismiss people.  (Read 23321 times)

itt: Lord Tony raises a very valid point about someone breaking multiple forum rules, is attacked because he is lord tony


itt: Lord Tony raises a very valid point about someone breaking multiple forum rules, is attacked because he is lord tony
do you even read tonys posts? nick is not in the wrong here, "lol ok" is the most acceptable response to ALL of tonys posts

do you even read tonys posts? nick is not in the wrong here, "lol ok" is the most acceptable response to ALL of tonys posts

lol ok freek

lol ok freek
Lol ok Frequency, you need to find other original ways to dismiss people.

Lol ok Frequency, you need to find other original ways to dismiss people.
Mhmm ok freek lol



I really don't get the butt hurt over a simple laugh followed by an agreement

And to call this crossposting is ridiculous considering it's such a simple phrase applicable in variety of situations


your all getting a drama


I really don't get the butt hurt over a simple laugh followed by an agreement

And to call this crossposting is ridiculous considering it's such a simple phrase applicable in variety of situations
looks real great

do you even read tonys posts? nick is not in the wrong here, "lol ok" is the most acceptable response to ALL of tonys posts

In other words:

"Tony makes posts I don't like, therefore rules and reason are invalid."

do you even read tonys posts? nick is not in the wrong here, "lol ok" is the most acceptable response to ALL of tonys posts
this is bullstuff and you know it, loving saying 'lol ok' is just downright dismissal.