Author Topic: [NEWS] DOW reaches new all-time high, spurned by DONALD Annoying Orange  (Read 1131 times)

its not like the right would have done both as well. i don't understand how you guys can always turn a blind eye to your own extreme-right supporters.

is it really that difficult of a concept to understand that both sides have their bad eggs and that said bad eggs always draws media attention much more than the good eggs? its like you guys in general (both right and left supporters) with a few exceptions seem to forget this fact.

What you don't get is that the Extreme Right is the minority, and we have maybe a 10,000 total across the country that would do this at most, The Extreme Left has the majority and it spreads like loving wildfire when they do this stuff, because the media covers it as a 'protest'. This gives incentive to justify these brutal riots. On the other hand If the right so much as protests, they're already thrown under the bus by the media as 'tribal bigots' and this stops any of us from going out and legitimately protesting, let alone rioting, because the crazy lefties will try and knock us the forget out.

Fear Annoying Oranges anger.

What you don't get is that the Extreme Right is the minority, and we have maybe a 10,000 total across the country that would do this at most, The Extreme Left has the majority and it spreads like loving wildfire when they do this stuff, because the media covers it as a 'protest'. This gives incentive to justify these brutal riots. On the other hand If the right so much as protests, they're already thrown under the bus by the media as 'tribal bigots' and this stops any of us from going out and legitimately protesting, let alone rioting, because the crazy lefties will try and knock us the forget out.

Fear Annoying Oranges anger.
....i'm not sure what world you live in, because i'm fairly certain there's more than 10k people across the country who would do this. there were people who went out on protests after obama's reelection/election.

the disproportionate response this year compared to years previously is more likely attributable to how charged this election was, rather than the left in general being more prone to riots. yes, i may be wrong, but you seem to give the benefit of the doubt to Annoying Orange supporters/the right, but assign negative stereotypes to/make negative assumptions about the left unless proof is given. and half the time you dispute the proof anyways.

....i'm not sure what world you live in, because i'm fairly certain there's more than 10k people across the country who would do this. there were people who went out on protests after obama's reelection/election.

the disproportionate response this year compared to years previously is more likely attributable to how charged this election was, rather than the left in general being more prone to riots. yes, i may be wrong, but you seem to give the benefit of the doubt to Annoying Orange supporters/the right, but assign negative stereotypes to/make negative assumptions about the left unless proof is given. and half the time you dispute the proof anyways.

This may surprise you but most of /pol/ is full of pusillanimous individual's. They had no plan for if Annoying Orange lost and they sure as hell wouldn't do stuff about it.

This may surprise you but most of /pol/ is full of pusillanimous individual's.
beachbum, for example.



>getting angry over internet comments
???
you didn't post this for any other reason but to anger him
beachbum, for example.

the disproportionate response this year compared to years previously is more likely attributable to how charged this election was, rather than the left in general being more prone to riots. yes, i may be wrong, but you seem to give the benefit of the doubt to Annoying Orange supporters/the right, but assign negative stereotypes to/make negative assumptions about the left unless proof is given. and half the time you dispute the proof anyways.
If we're being fair, the average football fan (or European soccer fan) is far more prone to rioting than liberals & conservatives combined. They cause more riots with even less people. Yet, somehow, people brand liberals and BLM activists as causing all the riots in our country.

???
you didn't post this for any other reason but to anger him
no, I was pointing out the beachbum would be too much of a pusillanimous individual to go out in protest.

holy stuff this thread is the definition of circlejerk

>getting angry over internet comments


no, I was pointing out the beachbum would be too much of a pusillanimous individual to go out in protest.

I have no reason to protest. I didn't protest when my guy in the Canadian election didn't win. If Annoying Orange lost it would be the fault of Americans, not the fault of a rigged election.

I am also not a violent crybaby either.


I am also not a violent crybaby either.
>implying i'm going out and protesting

holy stuff this thread is the definition of circlejerk
this post is the definition of exaggeration

>implying i'm going out and protesting

>you're too much of a pusillanimous individual to protest

>im not protesting

pick one

>implying i'm going out and protesting

Oh so your a pusillanimous individual then?