The credibility of TheArmyGuy is sorta odd because he could be exaggerating the events, but maybe he's right. It'd take a completely unbiased news source to actually back this up before you assume it's automatically true. I could live in a completely different country and tell you that our water tastes like candy, and that doesn't make it automatically true. You'd have to actually see for yourself or get a reliable source to back it up.
Another thing, you tend to talk about unregistered immigrants a lot but the hilarious thing is you're defeating your own argument there. You're essentially saying that you know the exact or approximate number of a population that you wouldn't even know exists because they aren't actually registered. If they're unregistered then you can't really count them, right? So how do you know that 90% of unregistered immigrants are males between the age of 19-30? A video of men crossing a highway?
gon have to disagree with you there, never said I knew about the amount of unregistered immigrants, but rather the male to female immigrant ratio of said population, and clear evidence for this is in almost every single refugee video the major majority of people present are young male adults or older male's with their children, with some women.
And it's not exactly 90%, but that's the most likely number given the amount of male refugees you see over female ones, of course I'm not there, but it's how it looks like in every single video/photo I've seen of this crCIA, it's always huge crowds of men, not huge crowds of women.
and sure have some more videos/article
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/thousands-refugees-begin-walking-along-6382515https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMmyPbik8vYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XelUcfPpmMThe refugees as terrorist misconception is extremely popular in history, and has existed in every single civilization, so i'm not going to blame you or anyone for believing in it. Probably one of the most famous cases was during WW2.
The united states didn't have an intensive refugee program for jewish refugees fleeing from the national socialist regime, and only saved a select number of valuable people, including Einstein. The US knew that the holocaust was currently underway and that jewish people were being mistreated, but they actually voted against helping the refugees out under the belief that the majority of jewish refugees were spies for Germany. Clearly, this misconception is easily held but can never be fully backed up and is usually untrue. This is the same for the current refugee crCIA. People tend to find videos of a small minority muslim population and using it to argue that all muslims are terrorists or rapists.
It's really up to you to choose the stance that will help the most people. If you believe that muslims are a threat to humanity, then that's your belief and nobody is going to stop you. Just know that it's not true or provable so your reasons for believing it are not guided by facts, but rather prejudice.
Well here's the thing, in this instance, this isn't a small population of these people, this is almost the
entirety of that population causing havok, I've said prior, there are still good and decent people in these groups but they're hard to come by, if this wasn't the case then we wouldn't have all these videos of muslims in London or Germany or France beating women on the street, raping women/children, and destroying entire streets of Paris.
Now I don't think Muslims are the threat, it's rather the individual themselves, not the religion, but of course for namesake we'll call them Muslims. As individuals I see them as a threat along with their beliefs, but some Muslims believe in other things over other Muslims, so I can't target the religion but rather the people carrying out these acts of hate, because saying it's all this one religions fault is just stupid and not the right thing to do.
Keep in mind: You could take a video of a muslim man saying 'allah akbar' and give it the title "Muslim man shows his devotion to god." Similarly you could take the same video and give it the title "Evil Refugee screams allah akbar in an attempt to scare innocent white people." This is sadly how 'truth' works in the 20th century.
Any kind of opinion site, whether it be left or right, centrist or anything, is not a trustworthy news source. You should rely on actual news that isn't falsely twisted or provided by opinions. Sites like wikinews, although a little questionable in credibility, literally have no bias and cover all news topics with complete objectivity and factuality.
Absolutely, but the thing is there's a difference between someone practicing their religion, and
someone straight up beating you, and in this case there was no twist of story, it's simply a Muslim man punishing this woman for not wanting to associate with him.
The thing about trustworthy news sources these days is that it's very difficult to find one, even MSM like Fox, CNN, you name it all have credibility issues and say different things alot of the times, but regardless of what news outlet it is, if they have photo/video evidence to support what they're saying then no salt should be taken with it.
