I do believe it's inherently selfish to not want to help people, since that's kinda the definition of the term. That seemed to go in-line with my post?
Help people in a way that helps the state. If helping someone is to the detriment to others, even indirectly, then it is no longer good.
We support people that can't support themselves. If you exclusively support those who can already support themselves--you're an starfish.
A lot of those who can't support themselves either did something to make themselves not deserve support, or they have some serious disadvantages (social, economic, or genetic) that *really* shouldn't be passed on to the next generation, much less rewarded. The exceptions should only require support temporarily (e.g. unemployment between jobs), or as a condition of a previous agreement (military veterens that enlist with the promise they'll receive support afterwards).
you have less sympathy for people too weak to fight for themselves? are you meaning to say something else
You know the saying "might makes right?" Well it seems that social justice is founded on the principle that "weakness makes right" which in my opinion is even worse. You don't deserve anything simply for having some weakness, and your value as a person should primarily be measured based on your contribution to society.
They prayed in a road because it worked.
We weren't hard enough on them, then.