Author Topic: Memorial being built for lynch victims  (Read 6541 times)

in a topic about black deaths, mentioning black deaths are off-topic.
In a topic about institutionalized racism and acts of terrorism that dominated the country years ago, mentioning crime, something that exists in every country and is perpetrated by every ethnic group in existence, is somehow on topic to you.

The only similarity is that it deals with black people. That's the strongest connection you could throw into this topic. Good job
« Last Edit: December 21, 2016, 09:58:03 PM by Perry »


apparently bringing up factual statistics is tribal now.

Well I mean it doesn't help when you're actually tribal...

I've had my suspicions, but you are certainly, undeniably, verifiably Social Justice Warrior material.
You believe the patriarchy is real, you undoubtly believe CNN, ABC, and NBC, and go with the left-biased 'fake news' list.

and now this "white american's can't have their culture represented".

Oh boy...
Perry has been quite dismissive to me as of recent (maybe not as bad as Satan but...)

Perry claimed to invalidate my statements by saying 'well these sources aren't trust worthy' in my source that was invalidating his sources, so we had a source war. (ya know, if he had actually posted sources. this stuff's gettin' worse than tony.)

MM is a handicap once again I see

I think it's cool. The fact that enough people are willing to donate money ($10m is impressive!) towards such a cause is quite astounding, and more or less for a good one at that.

In a topic about institutionalized racism and acts of terrorism that dominated the country years ago, mentioning crime, something that exists in every country and is perpetrated by every ethnic group in existence, is somehow on topic to you.
is institutionalized racism and terrorism not a crime? If anything, I'd say that the black on black crime rate issue garners an even more relevant discussion given that it's happening right now and constantly rather than an odd 70 years ago, that said I still think recognizing the lynchings from 1877 to 1950 is important.

The only similarity is that it deals with black people. That's the strongest connection you could throw into this topic. Good job
Not at all, the strongest connection here is the dynamic of what was happening then versus now, back then you had mobs of white people going out and abusing/killing innocent black's while chanting tribal slurs and god knows what, now we have mobs of black people going out and abusing/killing innocent white's while chanting tribal slurs and god knows what.

Just like now, the tribal white's between the years of said lynchings never whatsoever represented the white culture as a whole since there were many who disagreed with racism and discrimination in the forms that it was manifested in back then, and the same is happening now, except just with parts of the black community such as BLM, of course it doesn't represent the entire culture as still many upon many more disagree with the forms it's manifesting in now.

if you're saying recognizing crime that is even more relevant in time and significance is somehow "off-topic" then your entire OP is off-topic (not to mention take a gander at the section you posted it in too).
« Last Edit: December 22, 2016, 02:31:09 PM by rambo1220 »

if you're saying recognizing crime that is even more relevant in time and significance is somehow "off-topic" then your entire OP is off-topic (not to mention take a gander at the section you posted it in too).

so it should be fine for me to go into a thread discussing the War of 1812 and then randomly talking about the Falklands war.

>mentions that there are more black on black deaths than white on black deaths
>tribal


apparently bringing up factual statistics is tribal now.
It's the insinuation that's tribal, and you know that. You're pretending to be stupider than you are because that's necessary to support this terrible argument.

is institutionalized racism and terrorism not a crime?
Jesus, dude. You know the whole point of being institutionalized is that it will not be prosecuted as a crime, right?

arent we supposed to think about the present and ignore the past
i mean.... it wasn't bad to do BACK THEN, but, things have changed.
no longer is it okay to kill a person of color. so stop whining about it.
you want change, but this change has already occured. racism isn't nearly
as bad as it used to be; i know it still exists, but it's alot fairer for everyone compared to what it used to be
« Last Edit: December 23, 2016, 11:44:41 PM by crazies alt »

arent we supposed to think about the present and ignore the past
i mean.... it wasn't bad to do BACK THEN, but, things have changed.
no longer is it okay to kill a person of color. so stop whining about it.
So, surely you'd apply this to any memorial right? Like a WW2 Veteran's memorial, or to the kids who died in Gritty Grapnel. "That was more than 3 years ago, jesus! Stop whining about it!"

That is why this sort of statement comes off as tribal.

It's the insinuation that's tribal, and you know that.
How is pointing out that blacks kill more blacks than white's kill blacks tribal what the forget? It's literally pointing out that there is more conflict between this one race than there are between this race and another one.

Sorry, but I don't know that, because it's not true, if mentioning a race is tribal now then we might as well classify everyone into a single category of "human".

Jesus, dude. You know the whole point of being institutionalized is that it will not be prosecuted as a crime, right?
Whether or not it's prosecuted as a crime doesn't remove the label of it being a crime, if I got off the hook in court for killing someone it would still be a crime regardless of the result.


So, surely you'd apply this to any memorial right? Like a WW2 Veteran's memorial, or to the kids who died in Gritty Grapnel. "That was more than 3 years ago, jesus! Stop whining about it!"

That is why this sort of statement comes off as tribal.
I personally wouldn't, Gritty Grapnel was 3 years ago and these lynchings were nearly a hundred.

My apologies that it comes off as tribal, maybe don't get so triggered next time when I bring up a race without any tribal contents included you big dunce.

How is pointing out that blacks kill more blacks than white's kill blacks tribal what the forget? It's literally pointing out that there is more conflict between this one race than there are between this race and another one.
It's too late at night to do my whole spiel, but suffice to say you're missing a whole lot of essential historical context. The implication you're making here is that black people are making their own lives worse, but the higher rates of black crime are pretty much the direct result of segregation/red-lining/drug-laws/etc. Systems written into law pretty much exclusively by white people.

arent we supposed to think about the present and ignore the past
Might as well skip Christmas then, since it's all about some old dead Jew's birthday.

The implication you're making here is that black people are making their own lives worse, but the higher rates of black crime are pretty much the direct result of segregation/red-lining/drug-laws/etc. Systems written into law pretty much exclusively by white people.
Oh I absolutely recognize that and agree with it, the pain of racism is still there, but the problems from said populations that occur within don't help out too much either.

Oh I absolutely recognize that and agree with it, the pain of racism is still there, but the problems from said populations that occur within don't help out too much either.
Of course not, and there's lots of people living in those neighborhoods that work tirelessly to improve them. I just dislike the phrase 'black-on-black crime' since it seems to imply that all this happens in some sort of racial bubble.

nothing should genuinely be at all, by all means, judged in any way by their melanin levels.

I think that's our first mistake as a advanced society.