Shia Lebouf art project - CROWDER ON SITE

[IkeTheGeneric]

What are you a loving mondayfriend?

He's so angry he accidentally learned how to use compound words lmfao

[Ad Bot]

[AndroFox]

beachbum, holy crap, chill

[Insert Name Here²]

The adult argument we were trying to have was in a different thread.

Don't forget about this thread too.

[Decepticon]

what are we even arguing about?

[tab]

Labeouf copyright claimed his own stream???

RIP 4 years of lulz

[Masterlegodude]

Yes after he said nothing of value would be lost of Shia beat the stuff out of someone I said nothing of value would be lost of Kimon killed himself.  I have said this multiple times int he past to him whens he's made a stupid remark

Two wrongs don't make a right

And going from Kimon's 'beating someone up', to your 'kill yourself', is a bit extreme

And repeating that statement is pretty rude and, again, immature

[beachbum111111]

https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2017/01/26/shia-labeouf-arrested-in-new-york/21663346/
he's very clearly alone as he's being taken away, and the victim isn't identified or pointed out in any reliable news source. he's referred to simply as a "25 year old man".

I can't believe I have to loving find the timestamp for you https://youtu.be/WFx7VqYuGhc?t=13m45s
I was wrong it was a little while after he was arrested. I got it confused with another clip
You could have watched the whole video multiple times in the time you took to fight with me

quick question, what do you think BTFO means? because grammatically speaking that sentence doesn't mean anything

k

vehemently sticking to unverified / debatable claims, chastising anybody who doesn't take them as objectively true even though its most likely a misunderstanding on your part, and having a childish meltdown is exactly the reason that everybody is getting mad at you in the first place.

Kimon I sent you the source which is captured in an undebatable video and you completely refuse to look at it instead trying to dig up any other source to dispute it. At this point it's clear that all you want to do is whine and argue.

[IkeTheGeneric]

I have said this multiple times in the past to him whens he's made a stupid remark

It's great how you make remarks about adult debates and then casually reflect on how many times you've told a kid on the internet to kill themselves. Really wracks the noodles...

[e-maxx]

The adult argument we were trying to have was in a different thread.

the arguments you made in that thread are no better than the ones in this thread lol.

[IkeTheGeneric]

Kimon's got a spotty history, but at least he doesn't consistently throw temper tantrums when somebody disagrees with his political view

[beachbum111111]

He's so angry he accidentally learned how to use compound words lmfao

holy stuff it's not like I've never used that insult as a joke before!!111

It's great how you make remarks about adult debates and then casually reflect on how many times you've told a kid on the internet to kill themselves. Really wracks the noodles...

Because he's used that argument so many loving times. "nothing of value would be lost if it was legal to beat up people I disagree with" 'nothing of value would be lost if you killed yourself" I use his wording against him to make him fell stuffty.

Kimon's got a spotty history, but at least he doesn't consistently throw temper tantrums when somebody disagrees with his political view

It's not a temper tantrum when I swear about everything on this forum. I was raised in the country and grew up working in construction. Deal with it.

Two wrongs don't make a right

And going from Kimon's 'beating someone up', to your 'kill yourself', is a bit extreme

And repeating that statement is pretty rude and, again, immature

It's because he uses the same remark every time to justify this stuff. You guys are overreacting way more then I am. You should know by now the way I speak and how I stufftalk.

the arguments you made in that thread are no better than the ones in this thread lol.

Because it devolved into insert crying about insults (that were justified because, like I've established before, he can't read) I randomly threw into the TL;DR

[Poliwhirl]

I can't believe I have to loving find the timestamp for you https://youtu.be/WFx7VqYuGhc?t=13m45s

yeah almost like the burden of proof is on you because not a single reliable media source reported it or something. i thought liberals were the ones who hated doing work.
that 3 second clip of some random and still unidentified dude saying something vague to the police, possibly to cover his own ass, doesn't prove anything, and it certainly doesn't lend to you or jim's argument either.

holy stuff it's not like I've never used that insult as a joke before!!111

Because he's used that argument so many loving times. "nothing of value would be lost if it was legal to beat up people I disagree with" 'nothing of value would be lost if you killed yourself" I use his wording against him to make him fell stuffty.

It's not a temper tantrum when I swear about everything on this forum.

It's because he uses the same remark every time to justify this stuff. You guys are overreacting way more then I am. You should know by now the way I speak and how I stufftalk.

yeah, we do know by now.
we know that you always try to pass off your temper tantrums as "stuffposting" the second people ridicule you for it.

besides that i would like to clarify that i do not support the legalization of assault, i made that clear, and neo-national socialists go far beyond a simple "disagreement." they are parasites who utilize their freedom of speech to advocate for the destruction of it and all "inferior" races. it's about not allowing people with dangerous opinions to hold credibility. the second you start considering national socialistsm as a political opinion worth hearing out is when they worm their way into democracy and use it against us. they're pretty much the closest possible thing in this world to 2-dimensional comic book supervillains who unironically plan world domination. they're irredeemable because nothing they hope to contribute benefits anyone.

[kongo]

beachbum has reached maximum power

[IkeTheGeneric]

I use his wording against him to make him feel stuffty.

And you forgeted it up so much that not only did you prove his point, you got everyone on his side. Good job, Einstein.

[beachbum111111]

yeah almost like the burden of proof is on you

Oh you mean the proof I already posted that you were too lazy to go over?

that 3 second clip of some random and still unidentified dude saying something vague to the police, possibly to cover his own ass, doesn't prove anything, and it certainly doesn't lend to you or jim's argument either.yeah, we do know by now.

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/NYC-Shia-LaBeouf-Arrested-at-Annoying Orange-Livestream-Protest-Queens-411838345.html

Theres more proof of labouf being arrested for attacking his own then attacking a neo national socialist

we know that you always try to pass off your temper tantrums as "stuffposting" the second people ridicule you for it.

I guess I throw tantrums in every joke thread too, or every thread where I'm obviously loving happy.

besides that i would like to clarify that i do not support the legalization of assault, i made that clear, and neo-national socialists go far beyond a simple "disagreement." they are parasites who utilize their freedom of speech to advocate for the destruction of it and all "inferior" races. it's about not allowing people with dangerous opinions to hold credibility. the second you start considering national socialistsm as a political opinion worth hearing out is when they worm their way into democracy and use it against us. they're pretty much the closest possible thing in this world to 2-dimensional comic book supervillains who unironically plan world domination. they're irredeemable because nothing they hope to contribute benefits anyone.

Thats a very nice "us vs them" mentality. Like I have said before the only way to defeat national socialist's is to beat them in open debate and discourse. When you dehumanize them, attack them, and ridicule them you only make them look right because by contrast you look afraid that what they are saying might be right.

And you forgeted it up so much that not only did you prove his point, you got everyone on his side. Good job, Einstein.

Not really. You're just flipping your stuff because I said something mean. Which at this point isn't much worse then what he says

they are parasites who utilize their freedom of speech to advocate for the destruction of it and all "inferior" races. it's about not allowing people with dangerous opinions to hold credibility. the second you start considering national socialistsm as a political opinion worth hearing out is when they worm their way into democracy and use it against us. they're pretty much the closest possible thing in this world to 2-dimensional comic book supervillains who unironically plan world domination. they're irredeemable because nothing they hope to contribute benefits anyone.