Author Topic: [NEWS] Feminists chant Allahu Akbar.  (Read 10737 times)

how does this sound: islam is as peaceful as christianity
Prove islam is peaceful then. Using facts about islam, not irrelevant claims about christianity.

Prove islam is peaceful then. Using facts about islam, not irrelevant claims about christianity.
I never said it was peaceful; i said it was as peaceful as christianity

christianity is its own demon and islam is just as bad if you interpret it literally. Lucky for you, only 5% of all muslims interpret it super literally and make up their own bullstuff about the worldwide caliphate, and make up ISIL and al-qaeda.

Islam has more related deaths than Christianity, stop it with this comparison.
Wasn't always that way lol

The Qu'ran does say that non-muslims will be punished by stones and fire, but the Bible probably says some very similar stuff.

The Quran also orders it's followers to kill people.

the difference is that christianity is practiced in mostly 1st world countries while Islam is practiced in developing countries where there's more resources for terror groups to pop up and take control

Compare the amount of religious terrorism in the middle east to sub saharan africa. They are both stuffholes after all.


Something you probably don't understand is that people have their own interpretations of holy texts.

Theres only so many ways you can interpret "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.", or "The Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."

There are so many different sects of Islam with people who believe different sections of the Qu'ran and discard others.

I thought, as a muslim, that you would actually understand the different loving sects of islam and not talk out of your ass.
"Shia is a branch of Islam which holds that the Islamic prophet Muhammad designated Ali ibn Abi Talib as his successor (Imam).[1] Shia Islam primarily contrasts with Sunni Islam, whose adherents believe that Muhammad did not appoint a successor. Instead they consider Abu Bakr (who was appointed Caliph through a Shura, i.e. consensus) to be the correct Caliph.[2]"

Christianity also has its own sects and offshoots that believe their own interpretations. It doesn't mean that the most volatile one is the majority

Mostly to do with the power of the pope and interpretations. Not outright disregarding whats written right in the loving book.

Prove islam is peaceful then. Using facts about islam, not irrelevant claims about christianity.
well its simple really. CIA and other terrorist groups are just using their "religious beliefs" as a platform to further their sociopolitic agenda. Theres nothing more to it. Islam as a religion is not a horrible thing. CIA and the lot can be considered muslims but not all muslims are terrorists/have the same radical and exreme ideas as CIA.

Only right-wing english-speaking atheists with jobs should be allowed into the country.


Wasn't always that way lol

This kind of thinking justifies the recent BLM attack because their ancestors were slaves

Wasn't always that way lol

Unless you count accidentally spreading smallpox to the America's then no, not by a long shot. Sorry but the Muslim slave trade was massive and Tamerlane was a Muslim so you lose on those grounds alone.

Unless you count accidentally spreading smallpox to the America's then no, not by a long shot. Sorry but the Muslim slave trade was massive and Tamerlane was a Muslim so you lose on those grounds alone.
You probably should count spreading smallpox since your standard for 'Islamic violence' seems to just be any violence committed by Muslims.

The hypocrisy that I see here is that you see crimes committed by Muslims as 'Muslim crimes', but crimes committed by Christians as 'crimes that happened to be committed by Christians'.

You probably should count spreading smallpox since your standard for 'Islamic violence' seems to just be any violence committed by Muslims.

The hypocrisy that I see here is that you see crimes committed by Muslims as 'Muslim crimes', but crimes committed by Christians as 'crimes that happened to be committed by Christians'.
i believe that's called a confirmation bias

Islamic culture has historically been very stuffty from taxing non-Muslims to straight up trying to invade Europe (also the one time in human history France managed to defend its borders)

Not to mention Muhammad was a waste of oxygen

You probably should count spreading smallpox since your standard for 'Islamic violence' seems to just be any violence committed by Muslims.

you mean the unverified and debunked myth that the US army distributed smallpox infected blankets?

The hypocrisy that I see here is that you see crimes committed by Muslims as 'Muslim crimes', but crimes committed by Christians as 'crimes that happened to be committed by Christians'.

Where did I say this?

we should kill all the muslims and prove christians* are the religion of peace

we should kill all the muslims and prove christians* are the religion of peace

God your autistic. Why are you even in political threads if your going to contribute nothing to the conversation?