Author Topic: [NEWZ] LONDON MAYOR SADIQ "P'n'P" KHAN CONNECTED TO PARLIAMENT ATTACKER  (Read 2207 times)



If you read the article you'd find otherwise. Nothing in here says that he's connected to the parliment attacker. His brother in law has connections to someone who knows the parliament attacker, just like a friend of your friend probably knows a convicted criminal. That's just a mutual connection
« Last Edit: March 27, 2017, 11:08:27 PM by PhantOS »

If you read the article you'd find otherwise. Nothing in here says that he's connected to the parliment attacker
Proof pls?

*whistle* penalty flag too many capital letters in one thread title

Proof pls?
honestly were you expecting competent journalism from one of the thousands of cnn clones?

honestly were you expecting competent journalism from one of the thousands of cnn clones?
Can you tell me what makes this incompetent journalism and an cnn clone?

Wait, don't tell me... is it because it's not HuffPo?  Or CNN?  Or WSJ?

Can you tell me what makes this incompetent journalism and an cnn clone?

Wait, don't tell me... is it because it's not HuffPo?  Or CNN?  Or WSJ?
You won't even read the article itself. Not only is the article horrible but you can't read it anyways so why bother

Can you prove that I haven't read it?  Or are you just going to say "lol ok shill" and walk off?

Can you prove that I haven't read it?  Or are you just going to say "lol ok shill" and walk off?
I already explained it to you but apparently you can't read that either

genuinely can't tell if OP is being serious lately or not


If my friend is friends with someone who knows a serial killer, am I connected to a killing? Is that how it works?

If my friend is friends with someone who knows a serial killer, am I connected to a killing?
No.  Mr. Khan probably had nothing to do with the actual attack.  And this isn't his friend.  It's his brother in law m8, a bit different than some friend.

Can you tell me what makes this incompetent journalism and an cnn clone?
Basically any website that sounds either like a dumb conspiracy hub or a bunch of neck-beards in a basement publishing 'forbidden' news articles.

The 'disobedient' tag is the giveaway. There are reasons why NYTimes, BBC, and Al-Jazeera don't shove that bullstuff into their names. The little taglines like 'disobedient', 'wars', and 'dissent' are signaling words for idiots who have to constantly feel like their information is coming from some secret source that is working against 'them' (the all-powerful NWO, Soros-funded, Clinton-controlled, conspiratorial liberal whatever).