Author Topic: Antifa Gets arrested in 15 Seconds after Assaulting Annoying Orange Supporter  (Read 8166 times)

meme all you want you're still having a hard time defending capitalism

Without me people would start a communist uprising


I have an idea but I would rather watch it pan out as it currently is in very niche areas (hint, it's not ancap or any gay stuff like that). The fact of the matter is capitalism replaced a far more restricted system, which in turn replaced a far more restricted system, it's only logical that the more tools you give to an individual the more control they will have over the market, but in an individual way not a collectivist way.
giving individuals more power to exploit others won't do anything but worsen the flaws present in capitalism. making vast wealth gaps wider than they already are, and for fewer individuals probably wont lead to anything but a class uprising and, subsequently, communism

giving individuals more power to exploit others won't do anything but worsen the flaws present in capitalism.

Yes goy. Don't give more freedoms to your fellow man, restrict them and let big daddy government run everything. After all, they know whats best

giving more freedoms to your "fellow man" (corporate giants) allows them to exploit you more than they do now. we need regulations for a reason.

giving more freedoms to your "fellow man" (corporate giants) allows them to exploit you more than they do now. we need regulations for a reason.
it's only logical that the more tools you give to an individual the more control they will have over the market, but in an individual way not a collectivist way.

Individual as in individual people, not individuals who own massive companys

Individual as in individual people, not individuals who own massive companys
he fact of the matter is capitalism replaced a far more restricted system, which in turn replaced a far more restricted system, it's only logical that the more tools you give to an individual the more control they will have over the market, but in an individual way not a collectivist way.
what kind of tools are you talking about that give the ""individual"" more control over the market?

what kind of tools are you talking about that give the ""individual"" more control over the market?

I misworded it. I mean more tools that help individuals bring something of their own to sell on the market.



I misworded it. I mean more tools that help individuals bring something of their own to sell on the market.
do you have any in mind? right now your proposed system just seems like a pipe dream considering that you'd probably need more regulations on larger entities to make it easier for smaller entities to enter the market

do you have any in mind? right now your proposed system just seems like a pipe dream

I didn't propose a system nor is it the way I want us to go. I just said as individuals have more access to certain tools that we didn't in the past, it makes it easier for individuals to create something to put on the market. I have a very basic idea of where  we are going with our system but it is nothing concrete and the parts that are manifesting themselves need more time before we can judge if they are a success.

thing is corporations or large companies will always exist since certain services need a lot of cooperation and infrastructure to exist. for example no one person can produce an entire computer on the number/scale demanded by the economy, and everyone working separately would only reduce availability and create redundant optimizations and management as each tries to compete alone

i know this is a bit extreme of an example, but its for things like this, like water and electric and tv and internet services, that large companies exist. there is no way to make it easier for people to get into said market and compete since the initial capital they would need to make their service big enough to compete is too high, esp when companies like AT&T have existed for decades and reinvested their profits into improving or expanding their services. the only way to ensure these companies dont forget people over is regulation

deregulating smaller businesses carries the risk of local monopolies and business abuse becoming a problem, but i agree that they should only have the absolute minimum requirements like min wage and working conditions. and regarding companies on the internet, the dot com bubble should be enough clarification that even there some regulation is needed
« Last Edit: May 01, 2017, 10:12:38 PM by Conan »


thing is corporations or large companies will always exist since certain services need a lot of cooperation and infrastructure to exist. for example no one person can produce an entire computer on the number/scale demanded by the economy, and everyone working separately would only reduce availability and create redundant optimizations and management as each tries to compete alone

i know this is a bit extreme of an example, but its for things like this, like water and electric and tv and internet services, that large companies exist. there is no way to make it easier for people to get into said market and compete since the initial capital they would need to make their service big enough to compete is too high, esp when companies like AT&T have existed for decades and reinvested their profits into improving or expanding their services. the only way to ensure these companies dont forget people over is regulation

I never said that massive companies would magically disappear. They will always be necessity. But people are able to achieve much more in smaller groups today then larger groups would have been able to 100 years ago.