this may be up there on the list of "dumbest applications of neural networks"
why is it inherently a bad thing for a movie's cast to have a gender imbalance? if a writer makes roles for more males or more females, what does it matter? am I missing the point or does someone just get really butthurt and think women are deliberately being written out of films to oppress them or w.e?
There isn't really a problem with individual movies having a gender imbalance. For example, something like Mad Men naturally wouldn't have a lot of women. But if most movies are dominated by male characters, (which they seem to be) it speaks to a few possible explanations:
1. People don't find movies with women interestingIf this is actually the reason I think we should brown townyze why people find movies with women uninteresting. I don't think women are inherently uninteresting. It could be a cultural thing. Maybe we're socialized to find stories about men more interesting. (either incidentally or because they're men) No matter what, it's a phenomenon worth exploring.
2. Movie-writing is a male-dominated industry and male writers don't write about women for some reasonWe should brown townyze what is keeping women out of movie-writing. Movie-writing is similar to writing novels and there seems to be a pretty even gender ratio in that; that would make the reason seem to be environmental rather than some natural aversion to movie-writing.
Also, men should learn how to write women characters / about women if they can't. Why can't men write women? (if that's the reason) Women are just people. Men being unable to write women would seem to mean that men and women find eachother alien which I don't think is necessarily natural or healthy.
And regardless of the explanation, having a media where people are underrepresented has a marginalizing effect on those underrepresented groups.