Author Topic: [NEWs] CNN got caught for faking news.  (Read 10243 times)

If showing the caliber of people 'reporting on this' is proving his point, then you would have believed his bullstuff anyway. I am at no obligation to frame this in a way that appeals to idiots.
You're dismissing claims because of their source, and this is NOT a valid way of dismissing claims.
Whenever I've said "Fake News" about CNN, and then you turn around and do this stuff, has proven to me you don't get the point I'm trying to get across in my posts.

This is a battle of the Hypocrites, and no one wins a battle using tainted tools.

You're dismissing claims because of their source, and this is NOT a valid way of dismissing claims.
It's absolutely a valid way of dismissing claims when the 'source' has a documented, historic record of falsifying information and publishing articles that are demonstrably untrue. No medical journal will publish anything written by Andrew Wakefield because he wrote an article with falsified data in order to implicate vaccines as causing autism. The Bogdanoff Twins can't work in physics anymore because they submitted a paper that was literally just filled with pseudo-technical nonsensical jargon. And nobody trusts Brian Williams as a war reporter anymore because he lied about flying in a crashed helicopter.

Any rational person knows to ignore people who are habitual bullstuffters. You have an obligation as a writer to follow journalistic integrity, and you aren't entitled to second chances after you knowingly disregard the rules. Giving people a blank slate just because it's a new claim only guarantees that you'll be debunking their bullstuff over and over.

You're proving his point you know
This might unironically be your dumbest loving post ever. You aren't usually that bad so this kinda hit me with a highly painful mental barrage of dumb. Normally when I see it's from Mathew or something I can brace but in your case it really caught me off-guard.

Are you aware of how ridiculously stuffty this logic is? You can use this line of bullstuff to endorse anything. You're actually telling Seven that because he doesn't accept the loving Daily Stormer--a Neo national socialist rag--as a valid news source, he's somehow outed himself as a fool in denial? How loving ironic that you pretend like he's the ignorant one while stuffing so much stuff down your throat. It's a ridiculous catch-22 that should only exist as a loving joke. Nice job embarrassing yourself in front of everyone.

You're dismissing claims because of their source, and this is NOT a valid way of dismissing claims.
This applies to you too, though we've all come to expect this sort of reasoning from you.

yet another classic case of tony not giving a forget about posting reliable sources, or hell, any source at all.

This might unironically be your dumbest loving post ever. You aren't usually that bad so this kinda hit me with a highly painful mental barrage of dumb. Normally when I see it's from Mathew or something I can brace but in your case it really caught me off-guard.

Are you aware of how ridiculously stuffty this logic is? You can use this line of bullstuff to endorse anything. You're actually telling Seven that because he doesn't accept the loving Daily Stormer--a Neo national socialist rag--as a valid news source, he's somehow outed himself as a fool in denial? How loving ironic that you pretend like he's the ignorant one while stuffing so much stuff down your throat. It's a ridiculous catch-22 that should only exist as a loving joke. Nice job embarrassing yourself in front of everyone.
This applies to you too, though we've all come to expect this sort of reasoning from you.

Yiiiikes
Sorry I don't outright dismiss a source and 100% unreliable just because of the ideology of the people who write for it? I mean, did you at least read the article or did you join the circlejerk over the url name and use it as a cumrag instead? I dont even do that stuff with CNN, lol. They're reporting on info that came from someone at the scene, Mark Antro filmed it. You can get pissy about them being neo national socialists all you want, I really dont care, doesn't invalidate their reporting. If it were false reporting, then it's not valid, pretty simple.
He is proving Tony's point, get over it you cucumber

Sorry I don't outright dismiss a source and 100% unreliable just because of the ideology of the people who write for it?
No--you didn't dismiss it because you wanted to believe the bullstuff. Seventh's reasoning was clear. Why would the only people on the Internet reporting on a supposed fake be two highly unreliable rags with a serious vendetta against CNN? Why is it that FOX News or The Chicago Tribune or one of their many competetitors didn't report on this? Because it's bullstuff. You're trying to pretend like you're keeping an open mind by denying evidence while the truth is that you're doing exactly the opposite. You are literally what you accuse Seven of being.

CNN literally photoshops pics of shooters, they are much worse than others lol

unless you literally are under a rock, there is no way you all havnt seen that clip all over the net by now. its possibly the biggest story of the day.


to not have accidentally run into it by 20 times now, proves you are going out of your way to filter yourself into the furthest left and fakest news possible lol. even moderately left news is bashing it.

Why is it that FOX News or The Chicago Tribune or one of their many competetitors didn't report on this?
i'm not 100% certain of the legitimacy of this but the video was posted like a few hours ago

to not have accidentally run into it by 20 times now, proves you are going out of your way to filter yourself into the furthest left and fakest news possible lol. even moderately left news is bashing it.
and cue the ridiculous inflammatory remarks lol

No--you didn't dismiss it because you wanted to believe the bullstuff. Seventh's reasoning was clear. Why would the only people on the Internet reporting on a supposed fake be two highly unreliable rags with a serious vendetta against CNN? Why is it that FOX News or The Chicago Tribune or one of their many competetitors didn't report on this? Because it's bullstuff. You're trying to pretend like you're keeping an open mind by denying evidence while the truth is that you're doing exactly the opposite. You are literally what you accuse Seven of being.

If you insist, lmao

It's absolutely a valid way of dismissing claims when the 'source' has a documented, historic record of falsifying information and publishing articles that are demonstrably untrue. No medical journal will publish anything written by Andrew Wakefield because he wrote an article with falsified data in order to implicate vaccines as causing autism. The Bogdanoff Twins can't work in physics anymore because they submitted a paper that was literally just filled with pseudo-technical nonsensical jargon. And nobody trusts Brian Williams as a war reporter anymore because he lied about flying in a crashed helicopter.

Any rational person knows to ignore people who are habitual bullstuffters. You have an obligation as a writer to follow journalistic integrity, and you aren't entitled to second chances after you knowingly disregard the rules. Giving people a blank slate just because it's a new claim only guarantees that you'll be debunking their bullstuff over and over.
thank you for making the most sense of any person on this website for the longest time.

If you insist, lmao
tell me why other mainstream news sources are not reporting on it