Author Topic: [NEWs] CNN got caught for faking news.  (Read 10291 times)


master i'm sure whatever un-renovated basement you get your news from is definitely more sincere and truthful than the 1984 mainstream propaganda known as CNN
I trust Dennis Rodman's Pal with nukes more than I Trust CNN to bring me unbiased news.


sorry i was using your autistic logic to come to a conclusion.

If a protest has rioters with the same agenda, then the entire protest event is not peaceful. It would be peaceful if there were 0 rioters at the event.
we're going to go on this bullstuff again? i'm just going to start showing up at peaceful protests to cause problems so people can't call them peaceful.

we're going to go on this bullstuff again? i'm just going to start showing up at peaceful protests to cause problems so people can't call them peaceful.
If the majority are violent, its violent.

The majority are violent, period.

I trust Dennis Rodman's Pal with nukes more than I Trust CNN to bring me unbiased news.
unbiased news doesn't exist. wake up and smell the coffee

The majority are violent, period.
proof? because literally every peaceful protest in existence is 90% peaceful and 10% violent yet you love to classify those as riots in the past
« Last Edit: June 04, 2017, 11:47:55 PM by PhantOS »

Let's not conflate bias with propaganda

If a protest has rioters with the same agenda, then the entire protest event is not peaceful. It would be peaceful if there were 0 rioters at the event.
oh please, if you're protesting what you think is oppression are you going to stop peacefully protesting your cause just because some starfishs decided to be violent...? of course not. if that were the case, the government would just stage riots to stop protests they don't like

oh please, if you're protesting what you think is oppression are you going to stop peacefully protesting your cause just because some starfishs decided to be violent...? of course not. if that were the case, the government would just stage riots to stop protests they don't like
what are you talking about? clearly 99% of a group of people must be punished for the 1%

sorry i was using your autistic logic to come to a conclusion.
You aren't proving me wrong by acting like an idiot btw.

For a protest to be peaceful, then violence cannot be present at it nor encouraged. Peaceful =/= some violence and peace.

proof? because literally every peaceful protest in existence is 90% peaceful and 10% violent yet you love to classify those as riots in the past
No stuff every peaceful protest in existence is peaceful.
Are you loving serious?

For a protest to be peaceful, then violence cannot be present at it nor encouraged. Peaceful =/= some violence and peace.
You're handicapped specification for a peaceful protest is, believe it or not, handicapped.

It requires that 100% of the entire protest stay peaceful in order to be a 'peaceful protest.' the moment one person decides to punch someone, even if it's one person out of a million, the protest is no longer peaceful and is now a violent protest. This is what your criteria does, and this is why you're once again one of the most autistic users on the forum and most people can agree with me on that

No stuff every peaceful protest in existence is peaceful.
Are you loving serious?
i meant regular protest sorry

You're handicapped specification for a peaceful protest is, believe it or not, handicapped.

It requires that 100% of the entire protest stay peaceful in order to be a 'peaceful protest.' the moment one person decides to punch someone, even if it's one person out of a million, the protest is no longer peaceful and is now a violent protest. This is what your criteria does, and this is why you're once again one of the most autistic users on the forum and most people can agree with me on that
i meant regular protest sorry

If I stuff in my well, I'm not going to drink from it regardless of how big my well is


You're handicapped specification for a peaceful protest is, believe it or not, handicapped.
and this is why you're once again one of the most autistic users on the forum
i meant regular protest sorry
Unecessary and doesn't provide to your point or argument at all, grow up.

It requires that 100% of the entire protest stay peaceful in order to be a 'peaceful protest.' the moment one person decides to punch someone, even if it's one person out of a million, the protest is no longer peaceful and is now a violent protest.
Sure, if it's one or two people then yeah it can still be labeled peaceful. But when it's 10 - 20 or more rioting and inciting fights / vandalizing / doing illegal stuff, then it isn't exactly peaceful, now is it?