Author Topic: [NEWs] CNN got caught for faking news.  (Read 10294 times)

this is another thing you're several months late on
I get the feeling he's a crazy guy who used to work for CNN and got fired. After all, why would they out him if there's some sort of conspiracy to fake interviews?

I get the feeling he's a crazy guy who used to work for CNN and got fired. After all, why would they out him if there's some sort of conspiracy to fake interviews?

because they're stupid?


what even is an average crowd count in a protest then if the numbers don't lie
i don't see any statistics on any of these protests, but with the power of eyesight, one can see that most protest have over 3,000 people


if you want to count heads just to prove me wrong, go ahead. this is a crowd of around 2,000 people. if 10-20 of those were currently acting violently, then you'd already have a 99% peaceful protest and a 1% violent protest

the majority of BLM/anti Annoying Orange protests have at least 20x more people total, and with it around 20x more violent protesters. even then it still ends up being a small number

if you want to count heads just to prove me wrong, go ahead. this is a crowd of around 2,000 people. if 10-20 of those were currently acting violently, then you'd already have a 99% peaceful protest and a 1% violent protest

actually if you do the calculation of 2,000 protestors and you're claiming 10-20 rioters occur in that same protest then there is a range of 0.05%~1% protestors being violent. i did the math; you divide the fractions. i fixed that so yes you're right i kinda forgot to remove some 0's

so it's a decimal to a whole number basically yeah.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 03:23:14 AM by Timestamp »

actually if you do the calculation of 2,000 protestors and you're claiming 10-20 rioters occur in that same protest then there is a range of 0.05%~1% protestors being violent. i did the math; you divide the fractions. i fixed that so yes you're right i kinda forgot to remove some 0's
:/

You mean like CNN:cookieMonster:

CNN is not run by self-declared neonational socialists or anarcho-communists

look there's more proof and Fox did it too will you guys believe it now that Fox did it too who knows!

master matthew was right. mainstream media really is corrupt. first they share reliable news, now they report on an event that occurred? the string of corruption never ends

orwell tried to warn us and we didnt listen
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 07:55:19 AM by PhantOS »

CNN is not run by self-declared neonational socialists or anarcho-communists
that's just what they want you to think

master matthew was right. mainstream media really is corrupt. first they share reliable news, now they report on an event that occurred? the string of corruption never ends

orwell tried to warn us and we didnt listen

Once again ignoring the facts in order to fit your narrative
At least I correct myself when presented with unedited information
They say it was a "vigil" or protest but it's the same small group of people being reported as different protests in different areas? whatever man

who even watches the news anymore smh

Once again ignoring the facts in order to fit your narrative
The fact that CNN & other news outlets reported on an incident? If you cut away all the non-important stuff that's all it boils down to. It's not like CNN or FOX exclusively said "this looks fake so we should definitely air it"

they did what normal news should do: see something, report it and move on. they did nothing foul, they didn't pay anyone to pretend to be a protester, they didn't fake anything on purpose. they saw something and aired it, which is what they are payed to do

actually if you do the calculation of 2,000 protestors and you're claiming 10-20 rioters occur in that same protest then there is a range of 0.05%~1% protestors being violent. i did the math; you divide the fractions. i fixed that so yes you're right i kinda forgot to remove some 0's

so it's a decimal to a whole number basically yeah.
K

:/

guess i'm assuming that was a "thank you captain obvious moment" in which i feel stupid posting at 3 am in the morning