[nEWS} children taken away if you don't accept their gender

[King Tøny]

A new law in canada has passed. If you don't accept your child's identity they will be taken away.

What kind of crap is thsi?

[Ad Bot]

[DrenDran]

haha thanks tony for showing me this
thats why your my favorite son

[ReddBoi]

cool and nice

[Decepticon]

nice man thanks for this, hey if you like that check out my boy's soundcloud he does some nice tunes

[e-maxx]

don't forget to smash that like button 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Tudoreleu]

but that's just a theory. a TONY THEORY!

thanks for watching.

[Master Matthew²]

How can canada take children away, if canada doesn't exisy?

[Nonnel]

like, comment, and subscribe for more fake news

[Tezuni 2.0]

great moves tony, keep it up.  proud of you.

[Tactical Nuke]

https://heatst.com/culture-wars/canadas-new-law-lets-government-take-children-away-if-parents-dont-accept-their-gender-identity/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/liberal-bill-empowers-gvmt-to-take-kids-from-ontario-parents-who-dont-accep

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/06/new-ontario-law-enables-govt-to-seize-children-from-parents-opposing-gender-transition/

uh oh not breitbart

A Canadian province has passed a law that gives rights to the government to take away children from families that don’t accept their kid’s chosen “gender identity” or “gender expression”.

The Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017, also know as Bill 89, was passed in Ontario by a vote of 63 to 23, The Christian Times reported.

The law, which replaces old laws governing child protection, foster care and adoption services, instructs all child services and judges, to take into consideration a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, love, loveual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”

Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said “I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently.”

“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”

The old law used to allow parents to “direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” The new bill, however, amends such rights of the parents.

It now emphasizes a child’s “identity and allows parents only to “direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing, in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”

[Metario]

some highlights
http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479

[Nonnel]

oh no, parents are being forced to respect their children's psychological needs

[Insert Name Here²]

oh no, parents are being forced to respect their children's psychological needs

psychological "needs" which are loving nuts

If a kid goes "I identify as a desk chair and I love it when people sit their sweaty asses on me," the parents have to agree and support it or else Canada's version of DHS kicks in

it's loving nuts lol

[Punished Toxicology]

oh no, parents are being forced to respect their children's psychological needs

im gonna beat the loving stuff out of you nonnel

[The Resonte!]

psychological "needs" which are loving nuts

If a kid goes "I identify as a desk chair and I love it when people sit their sweaty asses on me," the parents have to agree and support it or else Canada's version of DHS kicks in

it's loving nuts lol

actually it makes a lot of sense

see if you don't care about your desk chair child you get to get rid of them legally
and if you do care then you'll care enough to deal with it
so really its a win-win


your example is totally slippery slope though it makes you sound like an idiot for thinking that would work as an brown townogy