Poll

Mistrial declared. Is he innocent or guilty?

Innocent
Guilty
Abstain until verdict delivered

Author Topic: Bill Cosby v. Andrea Constand: loveual Assault Trial | [NEWS] MISTRIAL CONFIRMED  (Read 5636 times)


but man

you came to the mans defense so fast

I answered this an hour after you posted it, how is that fast?

also if you dont like vox, you can always just oh i dont know, look at the sources they cited in their article lol

why didn't you just link the sources then, instead of a snarky article written by an opinionated writer on a leftist "news" site

i had expected you to read the article instead of just tossing it aside

my bad, clearly

Quote
On June 15, 2017 Bill Cosby a.k.a; Bill Cosby, was arrested in his Washington home due to possession of drugs. He was found in his upstairs bedroom, foaming at the mouth, and screaming profanities. Police investigated the area and found large quantities of cannabis and cocaine. Large amounts of alcohol were also thought to be a cause. He is currently in the Western State Hospital recovering. His girlfriend, Danielle, told Washington Police 'he had been acting odd lately' and 'he wasn't like himself'...

holy stuff guys

jpg (jello pudding gamer) got arrested :(

he will be able to harm women with his chocolate puddin pop no longer

i had expected you to read the article instead of just tossing it aside

my bad, clearly

I read the sources the article listed, not the article, because I'm not going to read an opinion piece to get facts. That's not how research works.

Uh-oh, Constand didn't specifically say "yes"!!!!1!!11!!!!1!! Whatever shall we do? I know! Let's refer to this scientist.

The admission to drugging women was just that; an admission to drugging women. There was no admission to raping women, and there was nothing that said that he did it without the women's consent.

Idk man I feel like admitting to drugging a woman comes with some serious implications
Of course these are implications alone and not applicable to court of law but.. I mean.. yeah

And his lawyer stopped the line of questioning before he could actually say no to raping her

Cosby maintains it was consensual love, so he would have probably said no

also, the "drugging women" was less "drugging women" and more "giving women drugs", which means that there's a possibility that they asked for the drugs, which is also what he is saying

also, the "drugging women" was less "drugging women" and more "giving women drugs"
where do you get this from

where do you get this from
i noticed the same thing from this article someone posted earlier
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-loveual-assault-allegations/index.html

Quote
Several women allege Cosby used cappuccino, soft drinks, wine or other beverages as vehicles to drug them, but accusers Constand, Serignese, Janice richardinson, Tamara Green, Victoria Valentino, Donna Motsinger and a woman identified only as Chelan have alleged Cosby gave them capsules or pills -- sometimes billing them as medication -- before assaulting them.

where do you get this from

from the source of the article you posted




"drugging women" implies that they were given drugs either forcefully or subversively, meanwhile he makes it clear that they're party drugs for heightening the loveual experience rather than rape drugs

If he said it was just "medication" then that would be subversive

If he said it was just "medication" then that would be subversive

the "medication" aspect of it comes into how he got the drugs, which is how every edgy teen ever gets their drugs, by lying about their condition

Cosby never said that the pills were meant to be medication, he has always made clear they were party drugs