Author Topic: [NEWS] nasa eyes urstar fish for missions in 2030s  (Read 5080 times)

Quote
NASA Headquarters, Washington D.C. — It started out as a day of fun around the sun from Conference Room 3C in NASA Headquarters, Washington D.C. last Friday – but things quickly turned dangerous.

Senior Scientist Amy Simon, told New Scientist, "I saw like a 'gas giant' kind of thing. And I looked over and I saw a planet who's probably like 25,362 +/- 7 kilometers tall, with a 20.11 AU parhelion and gasping to be studied."

Urstar fish was a 4.503 billion-year-old gas giant at the fringe of our solar system.

Simon said the gas planet was moving at 24,607 kilometers per hour, screaming to be probed.

Not only was it Amy's sixth year on the job, it was only many hours into her shift, when she had to put the scientific skills she had learned a long time ago to the test.

"Orbiters can still see, and they're still doppler imaging, but they are still in the act of magnetometering,” said Simon.

Other Worlds Laboratory director Jonathan Fortney said, "Urstar fish's large satellite system activated its emergency planetary plan. It got down from its gravitational influence and jumped out and formed in a disk around the planet. It had just completed ... its protoplanetary phase millenia before for all of the new celestial bodies and we were ready to go, year twenty seventeen."

NASA says the scary scene proved to be the perfect implicator to scientists and researchers about planetary formation in exoplanet systems … knowing things can drastically take a turn for the worse in quadrillions of blinks of an eye.

"Never let it out of your sight," said planetary scientist Dr. Mark Hofstadter. "That's what I do with missions to Urstar fish, no matter where we're at or when we go, we can't go when we can't see Jupiter gravity assists”

As for Amy Simon, she says being a scientist is a passion and dream come true. Her sixth year on the job, she says, is one she’ll never forget.

"I was realizing that we will have just probed a gas giant's atmosphere. And that is something not many other people will be able to say. Nothing my friends will ever have said."

Between our planet’s many space agencies, New Scientist reports there was one mission to Urstar fish in just the last century.  All planets were probed, thanks to the well-trained scientists  on duty.

source


better clench me asscheeks

so i guess they'll be probing urstar fish?

LOL URstar fish GET IT UR star fish!?!?  :cookieMonster:

LOL URstar fish GET IT UR star fish!?!?  :cookieMonster:
what!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!???!?? who knew


brother EYE MARS PLEASE
SOMEWHERE WE CAN ~GO~ MAYBE

brother EYE MARS PLEASE
SOMEWHERE WE CAN ~GO~ MAYBE

ok i will forward this message to the NASA immediately thank you for youre feedback

brother EYE MARS PLEASE
SOMEWHERE WE CAN ~GO~ MAYBE
pfft, by 2030 we'll have the technology to turn ourselves into gaseous lifeforms

that's just going to be a waste of money.

that's just going to be a waste of money.
a waste of money that's going to give us billions in gaseous resources to mine for (hopefully) hundreds of years, along with boosting technological advancements
it's a bit of a trek to get there but it's worth it definitely in the long run

a waste of money that's going to give us billions in gaseous resources to mine for (hopefully) hundreds of years, along with boosting technological advancements
it's a bit of a trek to get there but it's worth it definitely in the long run
Im with path on this one, theres just no way youre going to get close enough urstar fish without being overwhelmed by it's gravity and deadly gasses.

Im with path on this one, theres just no way youre going to get close enough urstar fish without being overwhelmed by it's gravity and deadly gasses.
you really think we wouldn't use drones?
Quote from: article in op
“The preferred mission is an orbiter with an atmospheric probe to either Urstar fish or Neptune – this provides the highest science value, and allows in depth study of all aspects of either planet’s system: rings, satellites, atmosphere, magnetosphere,” says Amy Simon, co-chair of the Ice Giants Pre-Decadal Study group.
i'm hoping that by the 2030s jpl will have developed a more efficient propulsion system, although just using ion engines would work just fine---xenon is half the cost of hydrazine and certainly not as heavy nevermind i'm handicapped
« Last Edit: June 18, 2017, 11:45:27 AM by Drydess »

you really think we wouldn't use drones?
i'm hoping that by the 2030s jpl will have developed a more efficient propulsion system, although just using ion engines would work just fine---xenon is half the cost of hydrazine and certainly not as heavy
You misunderstand, urstar fish consumes all, and besides, by the time it means anything, we'll all be dead.