The millions of people dislocated from their homes are not our problem. We have no obligation to help these people whatsoever, regardless of any past or current actions we have or are taking in their place of origin. As I stated earlier, the only people that should even be considered refugees are Syrians. Everyone else is an economic migrant taking advantage of the fact that refugees get set up real nice and easy once they get in to whatever country allows them to leech.
Which gets to my original point that you have to be a contemptuous, unperceptive motherforgeter to be so vehemently against refugees like yourself
"We have no obligation to help these people whatsoever", yet we have every obligation to bomb the stuff out of their home countries too. Right.
This "help the brownies" thing I'm referring to comes from people who infantilize brown people, such as yourself. You make it seem like these millions of people are completely incapable of doing anything in their countries without our help. Maybe that's true for places like Syria, but other places? Not so much. The Middle East will continue to be a stuffhole while people do nothing but run from it. Also, I'm not tribal. Stop calling me tribal, it's annoying. I have no will towards anyone because of their race, and I never will, because I would never be so shallow as to attribute negativity to a loving skin color.
Who said "brownie", not me
Also I'm not infantilizing refugees when I'm just plainly stating the situation they're in. You literally have camps filled with thousands of refugees left homeless after their countries turned to stuff
t. IRA supporter
Love that people can fall back on this now. You're faced with two groups of nationalism, Irish republicanism's solidarity with workers and the oppressed versus the UDA's colonial legion of doom with their murals of Catholics being stabbed with the Union Jack shouting "we will kill you". Tough choice, but I'd go with the former. Sorry if that's too controversial for you
