Author Topic: the google pixel 2 won't have a headphone jack  (Read 6885 times)

some people just dont have a need for a headphone jack and prefer bluetooth headphones, they will buy this phone. some people prefer a headphone jack, they will not buy this phone and will buy a different phone with a headphone jack

crazy how things like consumerism work huh
okay but why not make the phone with the headphone jack anyway? People who don't have a need for it will still buy it. And then you also get the people who want it buying it too.

phones are perfectly capable of having both a headphone jack and bluetooth audio, and many, many phones have done this. i have both wired and bluetooth headphones and i use both, although i use my wired ones much more often. i'd rather have both options than be forced to use bluetooth.

some people just dont have a need for a headphone jack and prefer bluetooth headphones, they will buy this phone. some people prefer a headphone jack, they will not buy this phone and will buy a different phone with a headphone jack

crazy how things like consumerism work huh
yeah but what car before 2013 has a bluetooth speaker in it?

okay but why not make the phone with the headphone jack anyway? People who don't have a need for it will still buy it. And then you also get the people who want it buying it too.
the same reason they dont put tape players on standard car radios anymore
yeah but what car before 2013 has a bluetooth speaker in it?
the 2004 acura tl

I use a Moto z and I loving hate the design, a finger print sensor at the bottom and then the autistic Android home buttons on top of the fingerprint sensor? That takes away a good bit of screen instead of just putting the Android home buttons where the fingerprint sensor just have the loving thing be the home button. What the forget is Motorola

the same reason they dont put tape players on standard car radios anymore
And for good reason too. Because almost no one uses tape players. There's still an overwhelming amount of people that use headphones.
Why? Because unlike cassette tapes, they aren't used as storage, thus they weren't deemed obsolete by their capacity.
Tapes were also deemed obsolete because they needed to be rewound, where digital media doesn't.

Tapes just simply had significantly less features than the technology that surpassed it. Wired and bluetooth headphones have almost the same features. Wired headphones can plug into practically anything that plays sound (the only exceptions I can think of are those new phones). Bluetooth headphones are wireless.

Tape players also take up significantly more space than a headphone jack. Even in relativity.



some people just dont have a need for a headphone jack and prefer bluetooth headphones, they will buy this phone. some people prefer a headphone jack, they will not buy this phone and will buy a different phone with a headphone jack

crazy how things like consumerism work huh
sure but the nexus/pixel line are google's only line of phones (aka one of the only lines of phones that come with stock android and not some bullstuff bloaty thing built on top of android) so it just sucks that the ONE PHONE that they're moving forward with has a headphone jack

luckily i think ill be able to stick with my pixel 1 through the lifecycle of the pixel 2 if i really have to

oh well
i'm happy with my nexus 6p but when it comes time for an upgrade i guess i'll look into the oneplus, i've heard good things about it

i just realized it's gonna be fantastic having to deal with no headphone jack and blueborne at the same time

forced possible viruses in order to use headphones


Here's an interesting article by Android Authority on this.

http://www.androidauthority.com/was-ditching-the-headphone-jack-a-good-idea-800101/

Quote from: Android Authority
Ever since Apple purchased a majority stake in Beats Audio for $3.2 billion in 2015, they’ve earned nearly half of all money spent buying Bluetooth headphones. When Apple kills headphone jacks on their products, they’re simultaneously trying to lock people into their own ecosystem, and increase demand for other high-margin products they peddle. On top of that, a smartphone without the headphone jack means Bluetooth headphones will be a major cash cow simply because the vast majority of listeners do not currently own Bluetooth headphones. It’s a smart business plan—but a giant middle finger to consumers, who now have to spend hundreds of dollars fixing a problem that didn’t exist until some literal Monopoly men in Cupertino decided it needed to be one.

What baffles me is why Android manufactures are falling for this. They're giving Apple more money or saying they want to give Apple more money by ditching the headphone jack. That, and aside from diehard Apple fanboys, I have yet to meet or talk with anyone that actually supports the removal of the headphone jack. There are some people who are like "meh, I don't care." But almost no one actually wants this.

This honestly pisses me off a lot. As much as I like the idea of the new Pixels or the new iPhone (shocker, I like both!), I simply can't in good faith buy a phone without a headphone jack. That would be me saying that what they're doing is OK.

Also, to those of you saying you're gonna buy an HTC... You do realize that HTC's three high-end phones right now have no headphone jack, right? The HTC Bolt, the HTC U Ultra, and the HTC U11 all suffer from this same issue, so...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 12:09:57 PM by Gandalf »

Also, to those of you saying you're gonna buy an HTC... You do realize that HTC's three high-end phones right now have no headphone jack, right? The HTC Bolt, the HTC U Ultra, and the HTC U11 all suffer from this same issue, so...

i don't think anyone here but me mentioned HTC, and i meant to say i'd rather go for an HTC 10. this is clearly news to me, so

i don't think anyone here but me mentioned HTC, and i meant to say i'd rather go for an HTC 10. this is clearly news to me, so
Nope, someone else did too.
i almost had faith in this
forget it, htcs are going to be my next phone